ReviewAIMS microbiology2024
Microbial feed additives in ruminant feeding.
Review in AIMS microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Milk-based multi-omics reveals distinct quality signatures associated with Astragalus polysaccharide supplementation in late lactation goats.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Dietary supplementation with Enterococcus faecium Ef026 elicits a systemic improvement in Hy-Line Brown laying hens during the mid-to-late laying phase.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Adding a Yeast Blend to the Diet of Holstein Females Minimizes the Negative Impacts of Ingesting Feed Naturally Contaminated with Aflatoxin B1.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Quality and microbial community analysis of solid-state fermented feed with mixed bacteria from corn silage.Animal biotechnology · 2025Article
- The Effects of Dietary Glycerol Fatty Acid Esters on the Production Performance, Serum Biochemistry, and Rumen Microbial Community of Crossbred Simmental Bulls.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Industrial Microbial Technologies for Feed Protein Production from Non-Protein Nitrogen.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- The effect of Aspergillus oryzae fermentation product on production parameters, rumen environment, and fiber degradability of Jersey cows grazing ryegrass-dominant pasture.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Effect of adding citrus flavonoid (Bioflavex) to diet on growth, feed efficiency, rumen histomorphology, carcass traits and meat quality of lambs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main purposes of feed additives administration are to increase feed quality, feed utilization, and the performance and health of animals. For many years, antibiotic-based feed additives showed promising results; however, their administration in animal feeds has been banned due to some public concerns regarding their residues in the produced milk and meat from treated animals. Some microorganisms have desirable properties and elicit certain effects, which makes them potential alternatives to antibiotics to enhance intestinal health and ruminal fermentation. The commonly evaluated microorganisms are some species of bacteria and yeasts. Supplementing microorganisms to ruminants boosts animal health, feed digestion, ruminal fermentation, animal performance (meat and milk), and feed efficiency. Moreover, feeding microorganisms helps young calves adapt quickly to consume solid feed and prevents thriving populations of enteric pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract which cause diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.