ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2024
Achieving tendon enthesis regeneration across length scales.
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 3D-printed scaffold-based strategies for enthesis regeneration: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-guided discovery of a bioactive hydrogel for spatiotemporally orchestrated tendon-to-bone healing.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Silk cryogel and electrospun scaffold characterization for bone-tendon interface applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell activity across a graded scaffold-hydrogel composite biomaterial for tendon-to-bone enthesis repair.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical reattachment of tendon to bone is a clinical challenge, with unacceptably high retear rates in the early period after repair. A primary reason for these repeated tears is that the multiscale toughening mechanisms found at the healthy tendon enthesis are not regenerated during tendon-to-bone healing. The need for technologies to improve these outcomes is pressing, and the tissue engineering community has responded with many advances that hold promise for eventually regenerating the multiscale tissue interface that transfers loads between the two dissimilar materials, tendon, and bone. This review provides an assessment of the state of these approaches, with the aim of identifying a critical agenda for future progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.