Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219674›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2024

Estimating trans-ancestry genetic correlation with unbalanced data resources.

Bingxin Zhao, Xiaochen Yang, Hongtu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  3. Multi-organ imaging-derived polygenic indexes for brain and body health.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bingxin ZhaoDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania.
Xiaochen YangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University.
Hongtu ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Mapping the Causal Genetic-Imaging-Clinical Pathway for Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG082938 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Bingxin Zhao, Hongtu Zhu · 2023 to 2026
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG082938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose a novel method for estimating trans-ancestry genetic correlations in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using genetically-predicted observations. These correlations describe how genetic architecture of complex traits varies among populations. Our new estimator corrects for biases arising from prediction errors in high-dimensional weak GWAS signals, while addressing the ethnic diversity inherent in GWAS data, such as linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences. A distinguishing feature of our approach is its flexibility regarding sample sizes: it necessitates a large GWAS sample only from one population, while the secondary population may have a much smaller cohort, even in the hundreds. This design directly addresses the existing imbalance in GWAS data resources, where datasets for European populations typically outnumber those of non-European ancestries. Through extensive simulations and real data analysis from the UK Biobank study encompassing 26 complex traits, we validate the reliability of our method. Our results illuminate the broader implications of transferring genetic findings across diverse populations.

Indexed as

Data heterogeneityGWASHigh-dimensional predictionTrans-ancestry genetic correlationUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID39219674
PMCPMC11364214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.