ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2024
Estimating trans-ancestry genetic correlation with unbalanced data resources.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Association Studies of Delay Discounting and Impulsive Personality Traits in Children From the Adolescent Behavior and Cognitive Development Study.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2025Article
- Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Multi-organ imaging-derived polygenic indexes for brain and body health.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose a novel method for estimating trans-ancestry genetic correlations in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using genetically-predicted observations. These correlations describe how genetic architecture of complex traits varies among populations. Our new estimator corrects for biases arising from prediction errors in high-dimensional weak GWAS signals, while addressing the ethnic diversity inherent in GWAS data, such as linkage disequilibrium (LD) differences. A distinguishing feature of our approach is its flexibility regarding sample sizes: it necessitates a large GWAS sample only from one population, while the secondary population may have a much smaller cohort, even in the hundreds. This design directly addresses the existing imbalance in GWAS data resources, where datasets for European populations typically outnumber those of non-European ancestries. Through extensive simulations and real data analysis from the UK Biobank study encompassing 26 complex traits, we validate the reliability of our method. Our results illuminate the broader implications of transferring genetic findings across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.