ArticleThe East African health research journal2023
Clinical Audit for Integration of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases at the Primary Health Care Level in Tanzania.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-based chest X-ray screening versus symptom-based case presentation in the elderly: evidence from three consecutive years of data.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Barriers and enablers in implementing integrated primary health care: A qualitative assessment in West Sumbawa District, Indonesia.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Implementation fidelity of tuberculosis screening for Diabetes mellitus patients among healthcare providers offering diabetes services in Ubungo District, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of audit and feedback cycle in primary healthcare quality improvement.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Poor quality of health care services remains an important challenge in health care delivery systems. Here, we validate clinical audit tools and describe audit results of selected clinical standards related to communicable disease (CD) and non-communicable disease (NCD) integration at the primary health care level. Methodology: A multi-methods approach, including a retrospective cohort and cross-sectional design, was deployed concurrently at Health Centres. Separate evaluators assessed the Health Centres using an audit tool and the inter-rater/inter-observer reliability was estimated. The extent of adherence to clinical standards was measured in proportions for: infection prevention control, tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis including advanced TB/Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the diagnosis of chronic lung diseases, and the bidirectional screening and clinical management of TB and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Results: The inter-rater reliability for the clinical audit tools based on 130 individuals' charts was 99.5% (CI:99-100). The total estimated maximum score for infection prevention control was 114 and on average health centres scored 42 (37%). Only 3 (4%) of 80 individuals' medical charts with unexplained productive cough were evaluated for TB. None of the 24 individuals with HIV infection medical charts had vitals measured and only 6 (25%) patients with advanced HIV had a TB test performed, whereas 4 (17%) had a cryptococcal antigen test, and 1 (4%) had a chest radiograph. Also, 24 patients' chart from documented HIV negative with chronic cough had no records of spirometry or peak flowmeter or a chest radiograph. However, a diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as made in 17 (71%) and 7 (29%), respectively. TB was confirmed for 102 patients among whom only 12(12%) were screened for DM. The DM clinics had no TB presumptive registers. Patients with TB/DM (n=2) had a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement done and received appropriate management. Conclusion and recommendation: The developed clinical audit tools were reliable and could contribute to quality measurement for metrics-related integration of CD and NCD in Tanzania. Further investigations will determine if the clinical audit tools widely used in cycles can improve the quality of care in health care delivery systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.