Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219638›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2024

Better renal replacement therapy to improve sexual function in female patients with end-stage renal disease: A cross-sectional study.

Tjahjodjati Tjahjodjati, Steven Steven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tjahjodjati TjahjodjatiUrology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Steven StevenUrology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sexual dysfunction is commonly observed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sexual dysfunction in correlation with ESRD is associated with physiological and psychological problems resulting in low sexual desire, arousal, difficulties in achieving orgasm, and pain during intercourse. Studies on female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in correlation with renal replacement therapy are limited, and previous studies reporting contradictive results have indicated that the best modality for providing better outcomes (especially on FSD) remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to compare the sexual function between female patients with ESRD who were on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and those on hemodialysis (HD). Materials and methods: This study enrolled female patients who were randomly selected from the urology and renal division of the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic of our hospital from January 2020 to August 2021 and divided into the following groups: predialysis, HD, CAPD, and control groups. The participants were asked to fill out the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaires, and their data were recorded and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.0. Results: Of the 280 patients, 200 female patients were included in this study. The rate of FSD (cutoff: 26.55) was 42% in the control group, 72% in the predialysis group, 62% in the CAPD group, and 66% the in HD group. The control group had a higher mean score in all parameters ( Conclusions: Patients on CAPD had better FSFI scores than the female patients with ESRD who were on HD, and the scores of both groups of patients were better than those of the predialysis group.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseaseContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisFemale sexual dysfunctionHemodialysis

Identifiers

PMID39219638
PMCPMC11338005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.