ArticleCurrent urology2024
A comparison of the efficacy of dutasteride on reducing lower urinary tract symptoms among patients with small versus large benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Only a few reports have currently studied the efficacy of dutasteride in patients with small benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We investigated the efficacy of dutasteride on reducing lower urinary tract symptoms among them. Materials and methods: A total of 81 patients with BPH who completed 52weeks of 0.5?mg dutasteride treatment were enrolled. Each patient filled out the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) at baseline and at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Total testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, adenoma/prostate volume (PV), uroflowmetry analysis, and postvoid residual volume were evaluated at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up visit. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups according to PV at baseline. The groups were as follows: Group A (PV ≥ 30 mL) and Group B (PV < 30 mL). Results: Groups A and B had mean PVs of 52.1 and 23.6 mL and mean IPSS scores of 16.7 and 14.4, respectively. Group A had significantly higher OABSS and prostate-specific antigen levels at baseline than Group B, while no significant differences in any other baseline characteristics was observed. After dutasteride treatment, adenoma volume and PV decreased significantly, while testosterone level showed a significant increase in both groups. Group A showed significant improvements in the total IPSS, voiding and storage subscore of the IPSS, OABSS, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. Group B, on the other hand, also showed significant improvements only in the total IPSS, voiding subscore of the IPSS, and maximum flow rate. Conclusions: The present study suggests a possible beneficial effect of dutasteride treatment on the reduction of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with small and large BPH. However, the effectiveness of dutasteride was limited compared to patients with large BPH (PV ≥ 30 mL).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.