ArticleCurrent urology2024
Efficacy of nonsolvent flower pollen extracts in healthy women with urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study.
Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a debilitating and common condition that adversely affects quality of life. Prescriptive and surgical approaches for managing UI symptoms may result in undesirable risks and complications. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study investigated the efficacy of 2 nonsolvent flower pollen extracts on UI in healthy women. Materials and methods: One-hundred and fourteen women aged 40-75 years who scored ≥5 on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) were randomized to receive either Graminex® RCT Fem™ UI, Graminex® PollenBerry®, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the ICIQ-SF score between the trial and placebo groups after 24 weeks of supplementation. The secondary outcomes included changes in the frequency of nocturia (recorded in 3-day void diaries) and 24-hour leakage volume (assessed via pad weight) after 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks of supplementation and changes in stress-induced urinary leakage volume (after completion of a provocative maneuver challenge) after 24 weeks of supplementation. Results: All the groups demonstrated improvement in ICIQ-SF scores at week 24 ( Conclusions: RCT Fem™ UI supplementation resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in UI severity, with corresponding improvements in daily urinary leakage volume and frequency of nocturia. PollenBerry® significantly improved stress-induced urinary leakage volume, suggesting that it may be efficacious in women who are prone to stress UI. The study products were safe and well tolerated in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.