ArticleCurrent urology2024
Head-to-head comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant 177-Lu-PSMA-I&T radionuclide treatment followed by radical prostatectomy.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Head-to-head comparison of MRI-based PI-RR scoring system and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT: enhancing prostate cancer recurrence detection after radical prostatectomy.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Early Identification and Management of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Bridging the Resolution Gap in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Imaging: Quantum Dots as PSMA-Targeted Optical Probes.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa. Results: A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36-0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30-0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35-0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17-0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11-0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities. Conclusions: Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.