ReviewInternational journal of oncology2024
FGFR‑related phenotypic and functional profile of CAFs in prognostication of breast cancer (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the immunological effects of antibody-drug conjugates.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts to overcome stromal barriers in cancer immunotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- CAFs and Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dual Targeting of FAP-Directed Nanoparticles and FRα-Specific CAR-T Cells Induces Additive Anti-Tumor Effects in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Therapeutic Targeting.Cells · 2025Review
- Article
- Revisiting the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Prognostic value ofContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While preclinical studies consistently implicate FGFR‑signalling in breast cancer (BC) progression, clinical evidence fails to support these findings. It may be that the clinical significance of FGFR ought to be analysed in the context of the stroma, activating or repressing its function. The present review aimed to provide such a context by summarizing the existing data on the prognostic and/or predictive value of selected cancer‑associated fibroblasts (CAFs)‑related factors, that either directly or indirectly may affect FGFR‑signalling. PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Medline (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_home.html) databases were searched for the relevant literature related to the prognostic and/or predictive significance of: CAFs phenotypic markers (αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN and FAP), CAFs‑derived cognate FGFR ligands (FGF2, FGF5 and FGF17) or inducers of CAFs' paracrine activity (TGF‑β1, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF) both expressed in the tumour and circulating in the blood. A total of 68 articles were selected and thoroughly analysed. The findings consistently identified upregulation of αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF as poor prognostic markers in BC, while evaluation of the prognostic value of the remaining markers varied between the studies. The data confirm an association of CAFs‑specific features with BC prognosis, suggesting that both quantitative and qualitative profiling of the stroma might be required for an assessment of the true FGFR's clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.