ReviewOncology reports2024
Routes and molecular mechanisms of central nervous system involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (Review).
Review in Oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AML with t(16;21)(p11.2;q22)/FUS::ERG rearrangement presenting with hemophagocytes and multinucleated cells: a case report and literature review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Central Nervous System Involvement in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Pathophysiology to Neuroradiologic Features and the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- LTF promotes central nervous system leukemia progression via neutrophil serine proteases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a predominant form of leukemia. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement complicates its diagnosis due to limited diagnostic tools, as well as its treatment due to inadequate therapeutic methodologies and poor prognosis. Furthermore, its incidence rate is unclear. The mechanisms of AML cell mobilization from the bone marrow (BM) to the CNS are not fully elucidated, and the molecular factors contributing to CNS infiltration are insufficiently recognized. The present review aimed to enhance the understanding of CNS involvement of AML and its impact on CNS. The latest research on the pathways and mechanisms facilitating AML cells to escape the BM and infiltrate the CNS was reviewed. Additionally, novel therapeutic strategies targeting specific molecules and genes for treating CNS involvement in AML were examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.