ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024
Perinatal outcomes of antenatally diagnosed omphalocele and gastroschisis: a survey from a university hospital.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Management Considerations in Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects: A Case Series and Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical features and perinatal outcomes of antenatally diagnosed fetuses with omphalocele and gastroschisis. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study of prenatally diagnosed fetuses with omphalocele and gastroschisis followed-up and delivered at a university hospital. Demographic, pregnancy, birth and perinatal outcomes were compared between gastroschisis and omphalocele. Results: A total of 75 fetuses with omphalocele and 21 cases with gastroschisis were evaluated. The mean maternal age of women carrying a fetus with omphalocele was significantly higher than the women with gastroschisis (p=0.001). Associated structural anomalies were found in 53.3% and 4.7% of fetuses with omphalocele and gastroschisis, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of chromosomal anomaly was 8.3% in pregnancies with omphalocele. In liveborn pregnancies, the mean gestational age at delivery and birth weight did not differ between the study groups. Time to postoperative oral intake, duration of parenteral nutrition and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in babies with gastroschisis than omphalocele (p<0.01). Rates of termination, intrauterine, neonatal and infant death of fetuses with omphalocele were 25.3%, 6.7%, 10.7% and 2.7% respectively. Time to postoperative oral intake, duration of parenteral nutrition and duration of hospitalization were significantly longer in babies with complex compared to simple gastroschisis (p<0.01). Survival rates were 95.2%, 82.9% and 20% in fetuses with gastroschisis, isolated and non-isolated omphalocele, respectively. Conclusion: Associated structural and chromosomal anomalies were significantly more common in fetuses with omphalocele compared to those with gastroschisis. Prognosis of fetuses with omphalocele depended on the associated structural and chromosomal anomalies, whereas bowel compromise was the main determining factor in gastroschisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.