ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024
Comparison of three umbilical entry sites for intraperitoneal access by the direct trocar insertion technique: a randomized pilot study.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The most effective methods and entry sites for laparoscopic surgery remain a subject of ongoing investigation and discussion. The purpose of the study was to analyze and compare three umbilical entry sites for intraperitoneal access using the direct trocar insertion technique. Material and Methods: A randomized pilot study was conducted between March 2021 and January 2023, involving women eligible for laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The women were allocated to one of three equally sized groups based on trocar entry points: subumbilical, supraumbilical, or umbilical. Success and failure rates of trocar entry, factors influencing success or failure, and early and late complications were systematically evaluated and compared across groups. Results: A total of 243 patients, with a mean age of 32.93±8.33 years, were included in three groups of 81 each. Trocar entry success rates were 97.5%, 89.2%, and 89.5% in the supraumbilical, umbilical, and subumbilical groups, respectively (p>0.05). Failed trocar entry was significantly associated with age, gravidity, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, and abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (p<0.001). Regression analysis revealed that, in the subumbilical group, higher gravidity [odds ratios (OR): 0.390, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.174-0.872, p=0.022) and greater abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (OR: 0.090, 95% CI: 0.019-0.431, p=0.03) were associated with lower odds of successful trocar entry. In contrast, in the umbilical group, a higher waist circumference was associated with lower odds of successful trocar entry (OR: 0.673, 95% CI: 0.494-0.918, p=0.012). None of the covariates were significant in the supraumbilical group. Conclusion: The study highlighted the importance of selecting the appropriate trocar entry site in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Surgeons should consider factors such as age, gravidity, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, as these factors significantly influence the success of trocar entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.