Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39219023›Full record

ReviewPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025

11. Cervicogenic headache and occipital neuralgia.

Nicole Lefel, Hans van Suijlekom, Steven P C Cohen, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Jan Van Zundert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. 11. Cervicogenic headache and occipital neuralgia.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole LefelAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hans van SuijlekomAnesthesiology and Pain Management, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Steven P C CohenAnesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jan Willem KallewaardAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7681-1796
Jan Van ZundertAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-2036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervicogenic headache (CEH) and occipital neuralgia (ON) are headaches originating in the occiput and that radiate to the vertex. Because of the intimate relationship between structures based in the occiput and those in the upper cervical region, there is significant overlap between the presentation of CEH and ON. Diagnosis starts with a headache history to assess for diagnostic criteria formulated by the International Headache Society. Physical examination evaluates range of motion of the neck and the presence of tender areas or pressure points.

methodsThe literature for the diagnosis and treatment of CEH and ON was searched from 2015 through August 2022, retrieved, and summarized.

resultsConservative treatment includes pain education and self-care, analgesic medication, physical therapy (such as reducing secondary muscle tension and improving posture), the use of TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), or a combination of the aforementioned treatments. Injection at various anatomical locations with local anesthetic with or without corticosteroids can provide pain relief for a short period. Deep cervical plexus block can result in improved pain for less than 6 months. In both CEH and ON, an occipital nerve block can provide important diagnostic information and improve pain in some patients, with PRF providing greater long-term pain control. Radiofrequency ablation of the cervical facet joints can result in improvement for over 1 year. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) should be considered for the treatment of refractory ON.

conclusionThe treatment of CEH preferentially consists of radiofrequency treatment of the facet joints, while for ON, pulsed radiofrequency of the occipital nerves is indicated. For refractory cases, ONS may be considered.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaPost-Traumatic HeadacheHumansPain Managementcervicogenic headacheevidence‐based medicinelocal injection treatmentoccipital nerve stimulationoccipital neuralgiapharmacological treatmentpulsed radiofrequencyradiofrequencytranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39219023
PMCPMC11680101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.