Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218999›Full record

ArticleIntegrative zoology2024

Nephila spider male aggregation: preference for optimal female size and web clustering.

Matjaž Kuntner, Maj Kuntner, Eva Kuntner, Irena Kuntner, Jana Faganeli Pucer, Erik Štrumbelj, Daiqin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative zoology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matjaž KuntnerDepartment of Organisms and Ecosystems Research, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0057-2178
Maj KuntnerSpodnje Prapreče, Lukovica, Slovenia.
Eva KuntnerSpodnje Prapreče, Lukovica, Slovenia.
Irena KuntnerSpodnje Prapreče, Lukovica, Slovenia.
Jana Faganeli PucerFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-5554
Erik ŠtrumbeljFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-0491
Daiqin LiState Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering & Centre for Behavioural Ecology & Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-7734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism theory predicts biased operational sex ratios (OSRs) and an uneven distribution of males among certain females. We studied this phenomenon through a field census of the giant wood spider Nephila pilipes (family Nephilidae) in Singapore, a species where females are, on average, 6.9 times larger than males. Specifically, we tested two hypotheses concerning male distribution, given their tendency to aggregate in certain female webs. The optimal female size hypothesis predicts that males would predominantly occupy webs of intermediate-sized females. The web clustering hypothesis posits that more males would be found in webs closer together compared to those farther apart. Our snapshot census revealed a female-biased OSR (females: males = 1.85) with an uneven distribution of males in female webs. Most males were found in webs of intermediate-sized females aligning with the optimal female size hypothesis. Proximity among female webs was indicative of male presence, lending support to the web clustering hypothesis. While our study's limited sample size warrants caution, we conclude that in N. pilipes, male occupation of female webs is facilitated by the clustering of webs, and males prefer to cohabit with optimally sized, receptive females.

Indexed as

eSSDNephila pilipesoperational sex ratiossexual selectionsexual size dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID39218999
PMCPMC12235347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.