Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218994›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Development and validation of the surmising model for volumetric breast density using X-ray exposure conditions in digital mammography.

Mika Yamamuro, Yoshiyuki Asai, Takahiro Yamada, Yuichi Kimura, Kazunari Ishii, Yohan Kondo

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mika YamamuroRadiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Yoshiyuki AsaiRadiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. asai@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Takahiro YamadaDivision of Positron Emission Tomography Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2, Ono-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Yuichi KimuraFaculty of Informatics, Kindai University, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka, 577-8502, Japan.
Kazunari IshiiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Yohan KondoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata, 951-8518, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant Numbers of JP18K07736Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research JP21K07657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of breast density as a biomarker for breast cancer treatment has not been well established owing to the difficulty in measuring time-series changes in breast density. In this study, we developed a surmising model for breast density using prior mammograms through a multiple regression analysis, enabling a time series analysis of breast density. We acquired 1320 mediolateral oblique view mammograms to construct the surmising model using multiple regression analysis. The dependent variable was the breast density of the mammary gland region segmented by certified radiological technologists, and independent variables included the compressed breast thickness (CBT), exposure current times exposure second (mAs), tube voltage (kV), and patients' age. The coefficient of determination of the surmising model was 0.868. After applying the model, the correlation coefficients of the three groups based on the CBT (thin group, 18-36 mm; standard group, 38-46 mm; and thick group, 48-78 mm) were 0.913, 0.945, and 0.867, respectively, suggesting that the thick breast group had a significantly low correlation coefficient (p = 0.00231). In conclusion, breast density can be accurately surmised using the CBT, mAs, tube voltage, and patients' age, even in the absence of a mammogram image.

Indexed as

Breast DensityMammographyAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisX-RaysBreast cancer biomarkerBreast densityMammographic X-ray exposure conditionsSurmising model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.