Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218990›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large cage: a technique without additional spacer portal.

Zhengyu Xu, Zhong Zhuolin, Xiaowei Jing, Qingfeng Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhengyu XuDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine,Zhejiang University, N1, Shangcheng.st, Yiwu City, China.
Zhong ZhuolinDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine,Zhejiang University, N1, Shangcheng.st, Yiwu City, China.
Xiaowei JingDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine,Zhejiang University, N1, Shangcheng.st, Yiwu City, China.
Qingfeng HuDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine,Zhejiang University, N1, Shangcheng.st, Yiwu City, China. huqingfeng@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge spacers offer numerous advantages such as higher fusion rates and lower subsidence rates. However, due to the anatomical constraints of the approach, the use of large spacers in biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(BE-TLIF) necessitates an additional incision and special instruments for spacer implantation leading to less frequent use.

methodsThis study has refined several techniques within BE-TLIF. We insert the cage and impact the cage transverse with a special design instrument in the same working portal. This allows for the use of large spacers during BE-TLIF procedures without the need for an auxiliary cage-inserting incision.

conclusionThe technique is a straightforward, safe, and minimally invasive method for inserting large cages in the treatment of lumbar instability.

Indexed as

EndoscopyLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionHumansBiportal endoscopicLumbar instabilityTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID39218990
PMCPMC11367753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.