Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218966›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula.

J Prenda, J L Domínguez-Olmedo, E López-Lozano, R Fernández de Villarán, J J Negro

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J PrendaDepartamento de Ciencias Integradas, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain. jprenda@uhu.es.
J L Domínguez-OlmedoDepartamento de Tecnologías de la Información, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
E López-LozanoDepartamento de Ciencias Integradas, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
R Fernández de VillaránDepartamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
J J NegroEstación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

Junta de Andalucía. Operative FEDER Program. Andalusian Research Plan 2014-2020. Ref. P20_00354Junta de Andalucía. UE. Plan Complementario de I+D+i BIOD22_00033_15_PPCBUniversidad de Huelva. Operative FEDER Program Ref. UHU-202076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science data on biodiversity has experienced significant growth, largely driven by advancements in technology that facilitate data sharing. In recent years, mobile applications have provided a substantial boost to both the collection and sharing of this data. While this accessible information is undoubtedly valuable, we must consider the numerous biases present in this data when used for high-quality research. In this study, we analyse citizen science data for the birds of the Iberian Peninsula, comprising over 23 million unique records after filtering for duplicates (i.e., instances where the same observation was uploaded more than once). Using a 10 × 10 km square grid, we present information on well-surveyed cells (completeness) as well as temporal, taxonomic, geographical, and land use coverages. We found that the completeness of information is generally high, with better coverage around densely populated areas such as major cities and coastal regions, as well as popular birding destinations, which are frequently visited. The Mediterranean ecoregion and wetlands exhibit the highest levels of surveying. Furthermore, we observed an increase in temporal coverage since the 1980s and broad taxonomic coverage across all bird orders in the Iberian region. Our results underscore the utility of citizen science for many locations, as expressed in 10 × 10 km cells. However, they also highlight the inadequate data completeness across part of the territory, particularly in forested or sparsely inhabited areas. These findings not only identify cells suitable for bird diversity or conservation studies but also indicate areas where citizen-driven bird recording efforts should be encouraged.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBirdsCitizen ScienceAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesData AccuracyPortugalSpainAvifaunaBiodiversity managementConservationData completenessDigital repositoriesIberian Peninsula

Identifiers

PMID39218966
PMCPMC11366751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.