Observational studyScientific reports2024
Association of office blood pressure with ischemic and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05935397 (HanYang University Medical Center), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HanYang University Medical Center (HYUMC) PCI Registry
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Hyperuricemia in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical impact of proteinuria and blood pressure variability on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Association of systolic blood pressure target and variability with long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Clinical hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal blood pressure (BP) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This study aims to identify the optimal BP by investigating the association between average office BP and future clinical events in patients undergoing PCI. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 2012 to 2016 were included. They were divided into five groups according to the average follow-up BP after discharge. The co-primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) up to 5 years. NACE was defined as a composite of MACCE (all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, or any revascularization) or major bleeding. A total of 2845 patients were included, and among them, 787 (27.7%) experienced the NACE during the follow-up period. Patients in the highest SBP group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.495, confidence interval [CI] 1.189-1.880) and lowest SBP group (adjusted HR 1.625, CI 1.214-2.176) had a significantly higher risk of 5-year NACE. Similar associations were observed between SBP and the risk of MACCE, and similar results based on DBP categories were also observed. There was a J-curve relationship between SBP and DBP with respect to 5-year NACE and MACCE. The nadir point of risk for NACE and MACCE was found at 121.4/74.8 and 120.4/73.7 mmHg. In patients underwent PCI, there is a significant correlation between office BP level and clinical events, indicates the importance of efforts for optimal BP control to reduce ischemic and bleeding events.Trial registration: HanYang University Medical Center (HYUMC) Registry, NCT05935397.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.