Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Ecological impacts and supply demand evolution of the Yangtze to Huaihe water transfer project in Anhui section.

Wenqing Ding, Guangzhi Shi, Hui Zha, Haojie Miao, Mengmin Lu, Jing Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenqing DingSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Guangzhi ShiSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Hui ZhaSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Haojie MiaoSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Mengmin LuSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China.
Jing JinSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, Anhui, China. jinjing306@ahau.edu.cn.

Funding

Anhui Province of China social science innovation development research subject No.2021CX194General project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education in China No. 22YJC630047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities have profound impacts on land use and the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services (ESs). Various activities, such as urban construction, urban and rural planning, and inter-basin water transfer projects, continuously reshape land use patterns. This is a case study of the Anhui section of the Yangtze-Huaihe Water Diversion Project. Data from 2000, 2010, and 2020 is analyzed. Additionally, the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model is utilized to quantify the specific impacts of the water diversion project construction on the supply and demand of ESs. The results indicate that the comprehensive dynamic attitude of land use during the project construction period significantly increased, rising from 0.16 to 13.79%, and mainly affected forest, water areas, construction land, and unused land. Specifically, the construction of the project led to significant changes in water purification, biodiversity, and, especially, hydrological regulation services. Additionally, the migration of residents significantly impacted the demand for ESs. The study also found a significant correlation between land use changes and the balance of ES supply and demand: the proportion of cultivated land and construction land is positively correlated with the balance, while the proportion of forest, grassland, and water areas is negatively correlated. This study provides empirical data for understanding the environmental and socio-economic impacts of large-scale water diversion projects and offers a scientific basis for local mitigation and control of adverse impacts. Through quantitative analysis and model prediction, this research effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice, providing important references for sustainable regional development.

Indexed as

Ecosystem services (ESs)Inter-basin water transfer projectPatch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) modelSupply–demandThe Yangtze-to-Huaihe Water Diversion (YHWD) Project

Identifiers

PMID39218943
PMCPMC11366761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.