ArticleScientific reports2024
Upright CT-based evaluation of the effects of posture on skull-base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upright multidetector CT with 320-row gantry: a technical innovation providing insights into human anatomy under gravity and potential clinical implications.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common complication associated with endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery (EESBS). Postoperative mobilization-associated postural changes are considered to cause CSF leakage. However, no study has demonstrated a robust relationship between postural changes and CSF leakage. We used upright computed tomography (CT) to clarify the effects of postural changes on the reconstructed skull base (RSB) after EESBS. Thirty patients who underwent EESBS at our institution were prospectively included, and their upright and supine CTs were compared to measure morphological changes in the RSB. Patient clinical data were also collected from medical charts and surgical videos, and their relationships with morphological changes were assessed. In upright CTs, the RSB shifted intracranially by 0.94 (0.0-2.9) mm on average. This shift was larger in cases with lesions extending to the sphenoid sinus, dural defects, intraoperative pulsation of the RSB, and large bone windows. The direction of the change was opposite to intuitive movement driven by gravity because of reduced intracranial pressure in the sitting position. Thus, these shifts can be directly associated with postoperative CSF leakage caused by reconstruction material displacement. Skull-base reconstruction and postoperative postural management accounting for these morphological changes may be necessary for preventing CSF leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.