Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218867›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2024

Implementation of health-promoting retail initiatives in the Healthier Choices in Supermarkets Study-qualitative perspectives from a feasibility study.

Katrine Sidenius Duus, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Rikke Fredenslund Krølner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katrine Sidenius DuusThe National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. ksdu@sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1630-3132
Tine Tjørnhøj-ThomsenThe National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-6682
Rikke Fredenslund KrølnerThe National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4928-4310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving food environments like supermarkets has the potential to affect customers' health positively. Scholars suggest researchers and retailers collaborate closely on implementing and testing such health-promoting interventions, but knowledge of the implementation of such interventions is limited. We explore the implementation of four health-promoting food retail initiatives selected and developed by a partnership between a research institution, a large retail group, and a non-governmental organisation.

methodsThe four initiatives included downsizing of bags for pick'n' mix sweets and soda bottles at the check-out registers, shelf tags promoting healthier breakfast cereal options, and replacing a complimentary bun with a banana offered to children. The initiatives were implemented for 6 weeks (or longer if the store manager allowed it) in one store in Copenhagen, Denmark. Data were collected through observations, informal interviews with customers, and semi-structured interviews with retailers. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts and field notes inspired by process evaluation concepts and included quantitative summaries of selected data.

resultsTwo out of four initiatives were not implemented as intended. The implementation was delayed due to delivery issues, which also resulted in soda bottles not being downsized as intended. The maintenance of the shelf tags decreased over time. Retailers expressed different levels of acceptability towards the initiatives, with a preference for the complimentary banana for children. This was also the only initiative noticed by customers with both positive and negative responses. Barriers and facilitators of implementation fell into three themes: Health is not the number one priority, general capacity of retailers, and influence of customers and other stakeholders on store operation.

conclusionsThe retailers' interests, priorities, and general capacity influenced the initiative implementation. Retailers' acceptability of the initiatives was mixed despite their involvement in the pre-intervention phase. Our study also suggests that customer responses towards health-promoting initiatives, as well as cooperation with suppliers and manufacturers in the development phase, may be determining to successful implementation. Future studies should explore strategies to facilitate implementation, which can be applied prior to and during the intervention.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesFood MarketsHealth PromotionAdultChoice BehaviorCommerceDenmarkDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchHealth promotionImplementationInterventionInvolvementQualitative researchSupermarkets

Identifiers

PMID39218867
PMCPMC11367934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.