Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218851›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2024

Multi-omics and clustering analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying unmet needs for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Ken Asada, Syuzo Kaneko, Ken Takasawa, Kouya Shiraishi, Norio Shinkai, Yoko Shimada, Satoshi Takahashi, Hidenori Machino, Kazuma Kobayashi, Amina Bolatkan and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Identification of Clinically Relevant Genes Using Machine Learning Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Ken Asada *Division of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. ken.asada@riken.jp.
Syuzo Kaneko *Division of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ken Takasawa *Division of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kouya ShiraishiDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Norio ShinkaiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yoko ShimadaDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Satoshi TakahashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hidenori MachinoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kazuma KobayashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Amina BolatkanDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masaaki KomatsuDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masayoshi YamadaDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Mototaka MiyakeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hirokazu WatanabeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Akiko TateishiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takaaki MizunoDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yu OkuboDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masami MukaiDivision of Medical Informatics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Tatsuya YoshidaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yukihiro YoshidaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hidehito HorinouchiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Shun-Ichi WatanabeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yuichiro OheDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takashi KohnoDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. tkkohno@ncc.go.jp.
Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. rhamamot@ncc.go.jp.

Funding

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan BRIDGEJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP22ck0106643Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR1689Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18H04908)Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K07180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cancer genome contains several driver mutations. However, in some cases, no known drivers have been identified; these remaining areas of unmet needs, leading to limited progress in cancer therapy. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can identify non-coding alterations associated with the disease. Consequently, exploration of non-coding regions using WGS and other omics data such as ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq) to discern novel alterations and mechanisms related to tumorigenesis have been attractive these days.

methodsIntegrated multi-omics analyses, including WGS, ChIP-seq, DNA methylation, and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), were conducted on samples from patients with non-clinically actionable genetic alterations (non-CAGAs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Second-level cluster analysis was performed to reinforce the correlations associated with patient survival, as identified by RNA-seq. Subsequent differential gene expression analysis was performed to identify potential druggable targets.

resultsDifferences in H3K27ac marks in non-CAGAs LUAD were found and confirmed by analyzing RNA-seq data, in which mastermind-like transcriptional coactivator 2 (MAML2) was suppressed. The down-regulated genes whose expression was correlated to MAML2 expression were associated with patient prognosis. WGS analysis revealed somatic mutations associated with the H3K27ac marks in the MAML2 region and high levels of DNA methylation in MAML2 were observed in tumor samples. The second-level cluster analysis enabled patient stratification and subsequent analyses identified potential therapeutic target genes and treatment options.

conclusionsWe overcome the persistent challenges of identifying alterations or driver mutations in coding regions related to tumorigenesis through a novel approach combining multi-omics data with clinical information to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying non-CAGAs LUAD, stratify patients to improve patient prognosis, and identify potential therapeutic targets. This approach may be applicable to studies of other cancers with unmet needs.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticLung NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyMultiomicsMutationBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersEpigenomicsGenomicsLung adenocarcinomaMulti-omics analysisTherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID39218851
PMCPMC11367768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.