ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2024
Genome editing of porcine zygotes via lipofection of two guide RNAs using a CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double Electroporation Combined with Zona Pellucida Removal Improves Biallelic Genome Editing Efficiency in Porcine Embryos.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Advances in pig embryo production for cryopreservation, transfer and genome editing.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Article
- Indole-3-propionic acid supplementation during in vitro maturation improves in vitro production of porcine embryos.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex genome editing via electroporation is relatively efficient; however, lipofection is versatile because of its ease of use and low cost. Here, we aimed to determine the efficiency of lipofection in CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex genome editing using growth hormone receptor (GHR) and glycoprotein alpha-galactosyltransferase 1 (GGTA1)-targeting guide RNAs (gRNAs) in pig zygotes. Zona pellucida-free zygotes were collected 10 h after in vitro fertilization and incubated with Cas9, gRNAs, and Lipofectamine 2000 (LP2000) for 5 h. In Experiment 1, we evaluated the mutation efficiency of gRNAs targeting either GHR or GGTA1 in zygotes transfected using LP2000 and cultured in 4-well plates. In Experiment 2, we examined the effects of the culture method on the development, mutation rate, and mutation efficiency of zygotes with simultaneously double-edited GHR and GGTA1, cultured using 4-well (group culture) and 25-well plates (individual culture). In Experiment 3, we assessed the effect of additional GHR-targeted lipofection before and after simultaneous double gRNA-targeted lipofection on the mutation efficiency of edited embryos cultured in 25-well plates. No significant differences in mutation rates were observed between the zygotes edited with either gRNA. Moreover, the formation rate of blastocysts derived from GHR and GGTA1 double-edited zygotes was significantly increased in the 25-well plate culture compared to that in the 4-well plate culture. However, mutations were only observed in GGTA1 when zygotes were transfected with both gRNAs, irrespective of the culture method used. GHR mutations were detected only in blastocysts derived from zygotes subjected to GHR-targeted lipofection before simultaneous double gRNA-targeted lipofection. Overall, our results suggest that additional lipofection before simultaneous double gRNA-targeted lipofection induces additional mutations in the zygotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.