Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218465›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2024

What do you do with a normal appearing appendix? A national study of Pediatric Surgeons.

Yasser S AlFraih, Renad AlMutawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasser S AlFraihFrom the Department of Surgery (AlFraih), College of Medicine, King Saud University; and from the College of Medicine (Almutawa), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Riyadh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-3384
Renad AlMutawaFrom the Department of Surgery (AlFraih), College of Medicine, King Saud University; and from the College of Medicine (Almutawa), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Riyadh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurgeons may encounter a grossly normal appearing appendix in a patient with clinically suspected appendicitis. The purpose of this study is to determine the practice of pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia when this is encountered, and determine the reasons behind their decision making.

methodsAn electronic survey was sent to all pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia. Data points collected included demographics, peri-operative imaging preference, and personal practice when managing an intra-operative grossly normal appendix in symptomatic children.

resultsA total of 105 responses were obtained yielding a response rate of 33.8% The majority of respondents, 88 (87.1%) would remove the appendix while 13 (12.9%) would leave it in situ. The most common reason for removing the appendix was the possibility of microscopic/Endo appendicitis 71 (34.8%) while the most common reason for leaving the appendix in situ was the possible usage of the appendix for reconstructive benefits in the future 11 (50%). The overwhelming majority 87 (86.1%) felt that there were no sufficient guidelines on removal of the normal appearing appendix at the time of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.

conclusionThe majority of pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia would proceed with an appendectomy when an intra-operative grossly normal appendix is seen in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis. There is a clear lack of published pediatric guidelines and large studies to guide the correct course of action.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisAppendixSurgeonsChildFemaleHumansMalePediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Saudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnairesappendicitisnegative appendectomypediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID39218465
PMCPMC11376701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.