Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39218431›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2025

The 2022 WHO classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: An update on aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Olivera Casar-Borota, Pia Burman, M Beatriz Lopes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  6. Adenoma receptors and histologic characteristics determining management outcomes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivera Casar-BorotaDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-7331
Pia BurmanDepartment of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-8336
M Beatriz LopesDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-6727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are benign and slow growing with a low relapse rate over many years after surgical resection. However, about 40% are locally invasive and may not be surgically cured, and about one percentage demonstrate an aggressive clinical behavior. Exceptionally, these aggressive tumors may metastasize outside the sellar region to the central nervous system and/or systemically. The 2017 (4th Edition) WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors abandoned the terminology "atypical adenoma" for tumors previously considered to have potential for a more aggressive behavior since its prognostic value was not established. The 2022 (5th Edition) WHO Classification of the Pituitary Tumors emphasizes the concept that morphological features distinguish indolent tumors from locally aggressive ones, however, the proposed histological subtypes are not consistent with the real life clinical characteristics of patients with aggressive tumors/carcinomas. So far, no single clinical, radiological or histological parameter can determine the risk of growth or malignant progression. Novel promising molecular prognostic markers, such as mutations in ATRX, TP53, SF3B1, and epigenetic DNA modifications, will need to be verified in larger tumor cohorts. In this review, we provide a critical analysis of the WHO guidelines for prognostic stratification and diagnosis of aggressive and metastatic PitNETs. In addition, we discuss the new WHO recommendations for changing ICD-O and ICD-11 codes for PitNET tumor behavior from a neoplasm either "benign" or "unspecified, borderline, or uncertain behavior" to "malignant" neoplasm regardless of the clinical presentation, histopathological subtype, and tumor location. We encourage multidisciplinary initiatives for integrated clinical, histological and molecular classification, which would enable early recognition of these challenging tumors and initiation of more appropriate and aggressive treatments, ultimately improving the outcome.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPituitary NeoplasmsWorld Health OrganizationHumansPrognosismetastatic pituitary tumorPitNETpituitary adenomapituitary carcinomapituitary neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID39218431
PMCPMC11669403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.