ArticleEuropean heart journal2024
Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores.
Article in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram-based prediction of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- [Atrial fibrillation screening-reading the P-wave].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Studies on obesity-related atrial fibrillation in the past 20 years: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Medicine · 2026Article
- Physicians' perspectives on artificial intelligence in electrocardiography in clinical practice: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Factors Associated With AI-Estimated Atrial Fibrillation Likelihood During Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Documented Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Performance of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models in Image-Based Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Exploratory Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Foundation models for electrocardiogram interpretation: clinical implications.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Tools for the Screening of Structural and Valvular Heart Disease.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Prediction and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms and Ambulatory Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Empowering atrial fibrillation detection with TabPFN and SHAP interpretation based on ECG-derived features: a dual-center temporal validation study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: Why Time-Based Thresholds Are No Longer Fit for Purpose.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence 12-lead electrocardiography to determine atrial fibrillation risk among UK Biobank participants with predisposing conditions.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- Early differentiation between paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation based on interpretable machine learning: a multicenter retrospective study.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiograms Recorded in Sinus Rhythm for Detection and Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- A novel interpretable machine learning framework for predicting postpartum depression: a SHAP-based analysis of maternal and infant health indicators.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predicting Incident Atrial Fibrillation after Stroke: A Scoping Review of Clinical Scores, Biomarkers, and AI-Enhanced Strategies.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2026Article
- Neural network-based prediction of atrial fibrillation at discharge following cardiac surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDeep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical models and AF polygenic score (PGS).
methodsElectrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with pre-existing AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping data sets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. The performance of ECG-AI, clinical models, and PGS was assessed in the test data set. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital data set.
resultsA total of 669 782 ECGs from 145 323 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients, and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of .78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval: 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC-ROC = .62) and PGS (AUC-ROC = .59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001), with minimal changes to the AUC-ROC (.76-.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59 ± 18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year), ECG-AI model performance remained consistent (AUC-ROC = .77).
conclusionsECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and PGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.