Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217446›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2024

Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores.

Gilbert Jabbour, Alexis Nolin-Lapalme, Olivier Tastet, Denis Corbin, Paloma Jordà, Achille Sowa, Jacques Delfrate, David Busseuil, Julie G Hussin, Marie-Pierre Dubé and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Atrial fibrillation screening-reading the P-wave].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gilbert JabbourMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-5636-2238
Alexis Nolin-LapalmeMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Olivier TastetMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Denis CorbinMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Paloma JordàMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9236-1713
Achille SowaMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Jacques DelfrateMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
David BusseuilMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Julie G HussinMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-3339
Marie-Pierre DubéMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8442-4393
Jean-Claude TardifMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-8983
Léna RivardMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-0850
Laurent MacleMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-5239
Julia Cadrin-TourignyMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7489-8744
Paul KhairyMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-3800
Robert AvramMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-0270
Rafik TadrosMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-0258

Funding

André Chagnon Research ChairCanada Research ChairsCIHR Institute of Genetics Rare Diseases Fellowship TAK401439Fonds de la Recherche du QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2022-04262Philippa and Marvin Carsley ChairTakeda Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDeep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical models and AF polygenic score (PGS).

methodsElectrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with pre-existing AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping data sets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. The performance of ECG-AI, clinical models, and PGS was assessed in the test data set. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital data set.

resultsA total of 669 782 ECGs from 145 323 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients, and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of .78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval: 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC-ROC = .62) and PGS (AUC-ROC = .59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001), with minimal changes to the AUC-ROC (.76-.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59 ± 18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year), ECG-AI model performance remained consistent (AUC-ROC = .77).

conclusionsECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and PGS.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationDeep LearningElectrocardiographyAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritanceRisk AssessmentROC CurveAtrial fibrillationDeep learningElectrocardiogramPolygenic scores

Identifiers

PMID39217446
PMCPMC11631091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.