Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217380›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024

Volatile anesthetics for lung- and diaphragm-protective sedation.

Lukas M Müller-Wirtz, Brian O'Gara, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Marcus J Schultz, Jeremy R Beitler, Angela Jerath, Andreas Meiser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Volatile anaesthetics for ICU sedation: beyond hypnosis?Critical care (London, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lukas M Müller-WirtzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Brian O'GaraDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Marcelo Gama de AbreuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeremy R BeitlerColumbia Respiratory Critical Care Trials Group, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Angela JerathDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andreas MeiserDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. andreas.meiser@uks.eu.

Funding

Respiratory Drive in Acute Respiratory FailureR01HL168102 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Jeremy R. Beitler · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU4688-1-1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168102NIH HHS R01-HL168102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the complex interactions between sedation and invasive ventilation and examines the potential of volatile anesthetics for lung- and diaphragm-protective sedation. In the early stages of invasive ventilation, many critically ill patients experience insufficient respiratory drive and effort, leading to compromised diaphragm function. Compared with common intravenous agents, inhaled sedation with volatile anesthetics better preserves respiratory drive, potentially helping to maintain diaphragm function during prolonged periods of invasive ventilation. In turn, higher concentrations of volatile anesthetics reduce the size of spontaneously generated tidal volumes, potentially reducing lung stress and strain and with that the risk of self-inflicted lung injury. Taken together, inhaled sedation may allow titration of respiratory drive to maintain inspiratory efforts within lung- and diaphragm-protective ranges. Particularly in patients who are expected to require prolonged invasive ventilation, in whom the restoration of adequate but safe inspiratory effort is crucial for successful weaning, inhaled sedation represents an attractive option for lung- and diaphragm-protective sedation. A technical limitation is ventilatory dead space introduced by volatile anesthetic reflectors, although this impact is minimal and comparable to ventilation with heat and moisture exchangers. Further studies are imperative for a comprehensive understanding of the specific effects of inhaled sedation on respiratory drive and effort and, ultimately, how this translates into patient-centered outcomes in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationDiaphragmRespiration, ArtificialHumansLungAnesthetics, InhalationDiaphragmInhaled sedationIntensive careLungLung- and diaphragm-protective sedationVentilationVentilator weaningVolatile anesthetics

Identifiers

PMID39217380
PMCPMC11366159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.