Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217355›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2024

Deep learning for the harmonization of structural MRI scans: a survey.

Soolmaz Abbasi, Haoyu Lan, Jeiran Choupan, Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei, Gaurav Pandey, Bino Varghese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. AI for image quality and patient safety in CT and MRI.European radiology experimental · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soolmaz AbbasiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Haoyu LanDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeiran ChoupanDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nasim Sheikh-BahaeiDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gaurav PandeyDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Bino VargheseDepartment of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bino.varghese@med.usc.edu.

Funding

USCADRC Diversity Supplement PachicanoP30AG066530 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HELENA Chang CHUI · 2020 to 2026
$27.8M
Large-scale harmonization and integration of multi-modal ADNI data for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease and related dementiasR01NS128486 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jeiran Choupan, Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei · 2022 to 2026
$4.0M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIH HHS 5R01NS128486-03NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging datasets for research are frequently collected from multiple imaging centers using different scanners, protocols, and settings. These variations affect data consistency and compatibility across different sources. Image harmonization is a critical step to mitigate the effects of factors like inherent differences between various vendors, hardware upgrades, protocol changes, and scanner calibration drift, as well as to ensure consistent data for medical image processing techniques. Given the critical importance and widespread relevance of this issue, a vast array of image harmonization methodologies have emerged, with deep learning-based approaches driving substantial advancements in recent times. The goal of this review paper is to examine the latest deep learning techniques employed for image harmonization by analyzing cutting-edge architectural approaches in the field of medical image harmonization, evaluating both their strengths and limitations. This paper begins by providing a comprehensive fundamental overview of image harmonization strategies, covering three critical aspects: established imaging datasets, commonly used evaluation metrics, and characteristics of different scanners. Subsequently, this paper analyzes recent structural MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) harmonization techniques based on network architecture, network learning algorithm, network supervision strategy, and network output. The underlying architectures include U-Net, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), flow-based generative models, transformer-based approaches, as well as custom-designed network architectures. This paper investigates the effectiveness of Disentangled Representation Learning (DRL) as a pivotal learning algorithm in harmonization. Lastly, the review highlights the primary limitations in harmonization techniques, specifically the lack of comprehensive quantitative comparisons across different methods. The overall aim of this review is to serve as a guide for researchers and practitioners to select appropriate architectures based on their specific conditions and requirements. It also aims to foster discussions around ongoing challenges in the field and shed light on promising future research directions with the potential for significant advancements.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesDisentangled representation learningGenerative adversarial networksHarmonizationStructural MRIVariational autoencoders

Identifiers

PMID39217355
PMCPMC11365220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.