ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Improving Reproducibility of Volumetric Evaluation Using Computed Tomography in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiovascular imaging: clinical applications and future directions in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Longitudinal quantitative assessment of retinal crystalline deposits in bietti crystalline dystrophy.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The volumetric data obtained from the cardiac CT scan of congenital heart disease patients is important for defining patient's status and making decision for proper management. The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer, inter-observer, and interstudy reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) or functional single-ventricle (FSV) volume. And compared those between manual and using semi-automated segmentation tool. Total of 127 patients (56 female, 71 male; mean age 82.1 months) underwent pediatric protocol cardiac CT from January 2020 to December 2022. The volumetric data including both end-systolic and -diastolic volume and calculated EF were derived from both conventional semiautomatic region growing algorithms (CM, TeraRecon, TeraRecon, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) and deep learning-based annotation program (DLS, Medilabel, Ingradient, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) by three readers, who have different background knowledge or experience of radiology or image extraction before. The reproducibility was compared using intra- and inter-observer agreements. And the usability was measured using time for reconstruction and number of tests that were reconfigured before the reconfiguration time was reduced to less than 5 min. Inter- and intra-observer agreements showed better agreements degrees in DLS than CM in all analyzers. The time used for reconstruction showed significantly shorter in DLS compared with CM. And significantly small numbers of tests before the reconfiguration is needed in DLS than CM. Deep learning-based annotation program can be more accurate way for measurement of volumetric data for congenital heart disease patients with better reproducibility than conventional method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39217235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.