Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Optimizing Gaussian process regression (GPR) hyperparameters with three metaheuristic algorithms for viscosity prediction of suspensions containing microencapsulated PCMs.

Tao Hai, Ali Basem, As'ad Alizadeh, Kamal Sharma, Dheyaa J Jasim, Husam Rajab, Mohsen Ahmed, Murizah Kassim, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, Hamid Maleki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deciphering the performance of different surface models for corneal topography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tao HaiKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Ali BasemFaculty of Engineering, Warith Al-Anbiyaa University, Karbala, 56001, Iraq.
As'ad AlizadehDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil, Iraq.
Kamal SharmaInstitute of Engineering and Technology, GLA University, Mathura, U.P., 281406, India.
Dheyaa J JasimDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Al-Amarah University College, Maysan, Iraq.
Husam RajabCollege of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Alasala University, King Fahad Bin Abdulaziz Rd., Amanah, P.O.Box: 12666, 31483, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohsen AhmedImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Murizah KassimInstitute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (IBDAAI), Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Narinderjit Singh Sawaran SinghFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, 71800, Nilai, Malaysia.
Hamid MalekiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. hamid_maleki_2010@yahoo.com.

Funding

Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Education GZUAMT2022KF[07]science and technology foundation of Guizhou Province ZK[2024]661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suspensions containing microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCMs) play a crucial role in thermal energy storage (TES) systems and have applications in building materials, textiles, and cooling systems. This study focuses on accurately predicting the dynamic viscosity, a critical thermophysical property, of suspensions containing MPCMs and MXene particles using Gaussian process regression (GPR). Twelve hyperparameters (HPs) of GPR are analyzed separately and classified into three groups based on their importance. Three metaheuristic algorithms, namely genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and marine predators algorithm (MPA), are employed to optimize HPs. Optimizing the four most significant hyperparameters (covariance function, basis function, standardization, and sigma) within the first group using any of the three metaheuristic algorithms resulted in excellent outcomes. All algorithms achieved a reasonable R-value (0.9983), demonstrating their effectiveness in this context. The second group explored the impact of including additional, moderate-significant HPs, such as the fit method, predict method and optimizer. While the resulting models showed some improvement over the first group, the PSO-based model within this group exhibited the most noteworthy enhancement, achieving a higher R-value (0.99834). Finally, the third group was analyzed to examine the potential interactions between all twelve HPs. This comprehensive approach, employing the GA, yielded an optimized GPR model with the highest level of target compliance, reflected by an impressive R-value of 0.999224. The developed models are a cost-effective and efficient solution to reduce laboratory costs for various systems, from TES to thermal management.

Indexed as

Gaussian process regressionGenetic algorithmMarine predators algorithmMicroencapsulated PCMParticle swarm optimizationThermal energy storage

Identifiers

PMID39217234
PMCPMC11366012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.