ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025
Hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfield morphology in major depressive disorder: an ultra-high resolution MRI study at 7-Tesla.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuronal Cell-Specific sc-eQTL and Integrative eQTL-pQTL Mendelian Randomization Prioritize CKAP2 as a Candidate Gene for Major Depressive Disorder.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Observational
- Functional and structural connectivity of thalamic subnuclei in major depressive disorder at 7 Tesla.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Hippocampal subfield-specific imaging in depression: the translational power of ultra-high field MRI.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Distinct Trajectories of Amygdala Connectivity Patterns Characterize Remission vs. Non-Remission in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
- Differential alterations of thalamic subregions in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and comorbid internalizing/externalizing disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphological changes in the hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfields have been suggested to form part of the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the use of conventional MRI scanners and acquisition techniques has prevented in-depth examinations at the subfield level, precluding a fine-grained understanding of these subfields and their involvement in MDD pathophysiology. We uniquely employed ultra-high field MRI at 7.0 Tesla to map hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfields in MDD. Fifty-six MDD patients and 14 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in the final analysis. FreeSurfer protocols were used to segment hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfields. Bayesian analysis was then implemented to assess differences between groups and relations with clinical features. While no effect was found for MDD diagnosis (i.e., case-control comparison), clinical characteristics of MDD patients were associated with subfield volumes of the hippocampus, thalamus, and amygdala. Specifically, the severity of depressive symptoms, insomnia, and childhood trauma in MDD patients related to lower thalamic subfield volumes. In addition, MDD patients with typical MDD versus those with atypical MDD showed lower hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfield volumes. MDD patients with recurrent MDD versus those with first-episode MDD also showed lower thalamic subfield volumes. These findings allow uniquely fine-grained insights into hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala subfield morphology in MDD, linking some of them to the clinical manifestation of MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.