Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217178›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Fragmented micro-growth habitats present opportunities for alternative competitive outcomes.

Maxime Batsch, Isaline Guex, Helena Todorov, Clara M Heiman, Jordan Vacheron, Julia A Vorholt, Christoph Keel, Jan Roelof van der Meer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From predicted bacteriocins to ecological function.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Transfer and Fitness of ISMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Mosses in Urban Environments as Passive Biofilters and Organisms Impacted by Asbestos-Contaminated Habitats.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Habitat fragmentation enhances microbial collective defence.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxime BatschDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-7644-8863
Isaline GuexDepartment of Mathematics, University of Fribourg, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Helena TodorovDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clara M HeimanDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-7537
Jordan VacheronDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0031-1338
Julia A VorholtInstitute for Microbiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich), CH-8049, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christoph KeelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8968-735X
Jan Roelof van der MeerDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Janroelof.vandermeer@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-3082

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) NCCR Microbiomes - grant 180575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria in nature often thrive in fragmented environments, like soil pores, plant roots or plant leaves, leading to smaller isolated habitats, shared with fewer species. This spatial fragmentation can significantly influence bacterial interactions, affecting overall community diversity. To investigate this, we contrast paired bacterial growth in tiny picoliter droplets (1-3 cells per 35 pL up to 3-8 cells per species in 268 pL) with larger, uniform liquid cultures (about 2 million cells per 140 µl). We test four interaction scenarios using different bacterial strains: substrate competition, substrate independence, growth inhibition, and cell killing. In fragmented environments, interaction outcomes are more variable and sometimes even reverse compared to larger uniform cultures. Both experiments and simulations show that these differences stem mostly from variation in initial cell population growth phenotypes and their sizes. These effects are most significant with the smallest starting cell populations and lessen as population size increases. Simulations suggest that slower-growing species might survive competition by increasing growth variability. Our findings reveal how microhabitat fragmentation promotes diverse bacterial interaction outcomes, contributing to greater species diversity under competitive conditions.

Indexed as

EcosystemBacteriaComputer SimulationMicrobial InteractionsSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID39217178
PMCPMC11365936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.