Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39217077›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2024

Randomised Trial of No, Short-term, or Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Postoperative Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the Three-way Comparison of RADICALS-HD (NCT00541047).

Chris C Parker, Noel W Clarke, Adrian D Cook, Peter M Petersen, Charles N Catton, William R Cross, Howard Kynaston, Raj A Persad, Fred Saad, John Logue and 10 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical advances and practice updates in genitourinary cancers: a 2024 review from the multidisciplinary Spanish 'Cambados annual meeting'.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Apalutamide for high-risk localized prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy- A new Horizon.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The contemporary management of prostate cancer.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Review
  15. Round up.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chris C ParkerRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Noel W ClarkeDepartment of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Adrian D CookMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Peter M PetersenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charles N CattonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret, Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William R CrossDepartment of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Howard KynastonDivision of Cancer & Genetics, Cardiff University Medical School, Cardiff, UK.
Raj A PersadDepartment of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK.
Fred SaadDepartment of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
John LogueChristie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Heather PayneThe Prostate Centre, London, UK.
Claire AmosMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Lorna BowerThe Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rakesh RamanKent Oncology Centre, Kent & Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, UK.
Ian SayersDeanesly Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Jane WorldingUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Wendy R ParulekarCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Mahesh K B ParmarMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Matthew R SydesMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK. Electronic address: m.sydes@ucl.ac.uk.
RADICALS Investigators

Funding

Cancer Research UK 6381Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/02Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe use and duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with postoperative radiotherapy (RT) have been uncertain. RADICALS-HD compared adding no ("None"), 6-months ("Short"), or 24-mo ("Long") ADT to study efficacy in the long term.

methodsParticipants with prostate cancer were indicated for postoperative RT and agreed randomisation between all durations. ADT was allocated for 0, 6, or 24 mo. The primary outcome measure (OM) was metastasis-free survival (MFS). The secondary OMs included freedom from distant metastasis, overall survival, and initiation of nonprotocol ADT. Sample size was determined by two-way comparisons. Analyses followed standard time-to-event approaches and intention-to-treat principles. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Between 2007 and 2015, 492 participants were randomised one of three groups: 166 None, 164 Short, and 162 Long. The median age at randomisation was 66 yr; Gleason scores at surgery were as follows: <7 = 64 (13%), 3+4 = 229 (47%), 4+3 = 127 (26%), and 8+ = 72 (15%); T3b was 112 (23%); and T4 was 5 (1%). The median follow-up was 9.0 yr and, with MFS events reported for 89 participants (32 None, 31 Short, and 26 Long), there was no evidence of difference in MFS overall (logrank p = 0.98), and, for Long versus None, hazard ratio = 0.948 (95% confidence interval 0.54-1.68). After 10 yr, 80% None, 77% Short, and 81% Long patients were alive without metastatic disease. The three-way randomisation was not powered to conventional levels for assessment, yet provides a fair comparison. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy are usually favourable. In those indicated for postoperative RT and considered suitable for no, short-term, or long-term ADT, there was no evidence of improvement with addition of ADT. Future research should focus on patients at a higher risk of metastases in whom improvements are required more urgently.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsPostoperative CareProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAgedDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogen deprivation therapyClinical trialsDurationHormone therapyMultiarm trialProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyRadiotherapyRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39217077
PMCPMC7617288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.