Investigation Into the Subharmonic Response of Three Contrast Agents in Static and Dynamic Flow Environments Using a Commercially Available Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanner.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the subharmonic response of Lumason (also known as SonoVue; Bracco, Milan, Italy) to static and dynamic ambient pressures, with a direct comparison to Sonazoid (GE HealthCare, Oslo, Norway) and Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, MA, USA). The subharmonic responses of contrast agents can be exploited to perform subharmonic-aided pressure estimation.

methodsThe subharmonic response of each ultrasound contrast agent was evaluated in both a static and dynamic tank using a commercially available Logiq E10 clinical ultrasound scanner (GE HealthCare) equipped with subharmonic imaging (SHI) and an acoustic power-optimization algorithm. A C1-6 curvilinear array that transmits at 2.5 MHz and receives at 1.25 MHz in SHI mode was used to acquire the subharmonic signals. Data was transferred offline into MATLAB (MathWorks) to perform linear regression analysis and statistical testing for significance of the slopes (i.e., agent sensitivity).

resultsSonazoid and Definity showed an inverse linear dependency between subharmonic signal and hydrostatic pressure at all pressure ranges (static and dynamic) tested, with maximum sensitivity under 50 mmHg in the static tank (-0.190 and -0.194 dB/mmHg for Sonazoid and Definity, respectively). Lumason exhibited a tri-phasic subharmonic behavior, beginning with a linear trend from 0 to 90 mmHg (sensitivity = 0.069 dB/mmHg), followed by a plateau from 100 to 130 mmHg, and an inverse linear trend from 140 to 200 mmHg (sensitivity = -0.137 dB/mmHg).

conclusionThe subharmonic response of Lumason is tri-phasic and differs from Sonazoid and Definity. Further investigation is needed to solidify understanding of the subharmonic behavior of Lumason to identify its usefulness for subharmonic-aided pressure estimation.