ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society2024
The minimal important difference of one-minute-sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThere is a need for simple functional test to assess treatment response in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) in resource-constrained settings. The one-minute-sit-to-stand test (1-min-STS) is one such test. However, the minimal important difference (MID) for 1-min-STS in subjects with CPA remains unknown. Herein, we estimate the MID for 1-min-STS for CPA subjects. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical details of CPA subjects treated with oral azoles for 6 months. We included only subjects who completed the 1-min-STS test at baseline and 6 months. We used the change in VAS (visual analogue scale, for overall improvement) as an external anchor. We used the anchor and the distribution (standard deviation-based) methods to determine the MID estimates. We used the anchor-based method only if there was correlation of 0.3 with the 1-min-STS test.
resultsOne hundred-eight subjects completed the 1-min-STS test at baseline and 6 months. We did not find significant correlation between the change in VAS for overall improvement (r2 = 0.024, P value = 0.809) and the 1-min-STS test. The MID for the 1-min-STS test was 2 repetitions (range, 1.5-2.8 repetitions).
conclusionThe MID for the 1-min-STS test in subjects with CPA was 2 repetitions. Future studies using a global rating of change scale as an anchor must confirm our findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.