Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215968›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2024

How can we measure psychological safety in mental healthcare staff? Developing questionnaire items using a nominal groups technique.

Katharina Sophie Vogt, John Baker, Rebecca Coleman, Sarah Kendal, Bethany Griffin, Taha Anjum, Kirsty Louise Ashley, Bethany Lauren Archer, Katherine Berry, Robyn Feldman and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Katharina Sophie VogtBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Temple Bank House, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3911-637X
John BakerSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Rebecca ColemanCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, School of Health and Wellbeing, Clarice Pears Building, Glasgow G12 8TB, United Kingdom.
Sarah KendalSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Bethany GriffinBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Temple Bank House, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.
Taha AnjumSouth West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Ouchthorpe Lane, Wakefield WF1 3SP, United Kingdom.
Kirsty Louise AshleyIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
Bethany Lauren ArcherDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Katherine BerryDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Robyn FeldmanIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
Stephanie GrayIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
Sally Jane GilesNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Benjamin James HelliwellPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Humphrey House, Angouleme Way, Bury BL9 0EQ, United Kingdom.
Chelsea HillIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
Aimee Elisha HoganClinical Psychology, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.
Magdalena IwanowMersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Business Park, Trust Offices/V7 Buildings, Prescot L34 1PJ, United Kingdom.
Timon Anton Arie JansenSheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Centre Court, Atlas Way, Sheffield S4 7QQ, United Kingdom.
Zach JohnsonIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
James A KellyClinical Psychology, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.
Joshua LawDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GB, United Kingdom.
Emily MizenNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
Owenvbiugie Omorefe ObasohanTees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust, West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, Durham DL2 2TS, United Kingdom.
Maria PanagiotiNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Ffion Smith-WilkesIndependent expert, United Kingdom.
Sarah SteegNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Christopher D J TaylorDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Natasha TylerNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Sophie WadeCounselling & Mental Health Service, Palatine Centre, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Judith JohnsonBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Temple Bank House, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-013X

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
National Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire and Humber ARC NIHR 200166NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre PSTRC 2016 006NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre PSTRC-2016-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been growing concerns about the well-being of staff in inpatient mental health settings, with studies suggesting that they have higher burnout and greater work-related stress levels than staff in other healthcare sectors. When addressing staff well-being, psychological safety can be a useful concept. However, there is no measure of psychological safety that is suitable for use in inpatient mental health settings. Edmondson (1999) is the most commonly used measure of psychological safety, but it was designed for use in general physical healthcare settings. As inpatient mental health settings are unique environments, transferability of knowledge from physical to mental healthcare settings cannot be assumed. We sought to develop questionnaire items that capture psychological safety among healthcare staff working in acute inpatient mental healthcare settings. We used the nominal group technique, a consensus method involving rounds of discussion, idea generation, and item rating/ranking to identify priorities. Twenty-eight stakeholders participated, including 4 who had lived experience of mental health problems, 11 academics and 18 healthcare professionals (8 participants identified with more than 1 category). The study involved a workshop with three parts: (i) an overview of current research and limitations of the Edmondson (1999) measure as outlined above, (ii) discussion on what items should be retained from the Edmondson (1999) measure, and (iii) discussion on what items should be added to the Edmondson (1999) measure. Twenty-one items were generated and retained to capture psychological safety in inpatient mental health settings. These measure professionals' sense of being valued by their team and organization, feeling supported at work, feeling physically safe and protected from physical harm, and knowing they can raise concerns about risk and safety. This is the first study to generate questionnaire items suitable for measuring staff psychological safety in mental health settings. These have been generated via a consensus method to ensure stakeholders' views are reflected. Further research is needed to evaluate factor structure, internal reliability, and convergent validity.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesPsychological SafetySurveys and Questionnaireshealthcare workforcemental healthnominal groups techniquepatient safetypsychological safety

Identifiers

PMID39215968
PMCPMC11421378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.