Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215841›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Microbiological toxicity tests using standardized ISO/OECD methods-current state and outlook.

Uwe Strotmann, Marie-José Durand, Gerald Thouand, Christian Eberlein, Hermann J Heipieper, Stefan Gartiser, Udo Pagga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecotoxicological Assessment and Biodegradation of Prednisone by Aquatic Microorganisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Use of Rhizospheric Microorganisms ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cadmium Toxicity inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modulation of Zn Ion Toxicity inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Uwe StrotmannDept. of Chemistry, Westfälische Hochschule, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Marie-José DurandUMR 6144, Nantes Université, ONIRIS, CNRS, GEPEA, 85000, La Roche Sur Yon, France.
Gerald ThouandUMR 6144, Nantes Université, ONIRIS, CNRS, GEPEA, 85000, La Roche Sur Yon, France.
Christian EberleinDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Hermann J HeipieperDepartment of Molecular Environmental Biotechnology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany. hermann.heipieper@ufz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3723-9600
Stefan GartiserHydrotox GmbH, Bötzinger Str. 29, 79111, Freiburg, Germany.
Udo Pagga, Rüdigerstr. 49, 67069, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Funding

Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft KA2-HSC-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial toxicity tests play an important role in various scientific and technical fields including the risk assessment of chemical compounds in the environment. There is a large battery of normalized tests available that have been standardized by ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) and which are worldwide accepted and applied. The focus of this review is to provide information on microbial toxicity tests, which are used to elucidate effects in other laboratory tests such as biodegradation tests, and for the prediction of effects in natural and technical aqueous compartments in the environment. The various standardized tests as well as not normalized methods are described and their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In addition, the sensitivity and usefulness of such tests including a short comparison with other ecotoxicological tests is presented. Moreover, the far-reaching influence of microbial toxicity tests on biodegradation tests is also demonstrated. A new concept of the physiological potential of an inoculum (PPI) consisting of microbial toxicity tests whose results are expressed as a chemical resistance potential (CRP) and the biodegradation adaptation potential (BAP) of an inoculum is described that may be helpful to characterize inocula used for biodegradation tests. KEY POINTS: • Microbial toxicity tests standardized by ISO and OECD have large differences in sensitivity and applicability. • Standardized microbial toxicity tests in combination with biodegradability tests open a new way to characterize inocula for biodegradation tests. • Standardized microbial toxicity tests together with ecotoxicity tests can form a very effective toolbox for the characterization of toxic effects of chemicals.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalToxicity TestsBacteriaEcotoxicologyEnvironmental PollutantsOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentEnvironmental PollutantsBiodegradationBiodegradation adaptation potential (BAP)Chemical resistance potential (CRP)Microbial toxicityPhysiological potential of an inoculum (PPI)Standardized ISO and OECD testsToxicity monitoringToximeterWastewater treatment plant

Identifiers

PMID39215841
PMCPMC11365844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.