Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215594›Full record

ArticlePlant & cell physiology2024

Heritable Tissue-Culture-Free Gene Editing in Nicotiana benthamiana through Viral Delivery of SpCas9 and sgRNA.

Tetsuya Yoshida, Masayuki Ishikawa, Seiichi Toki, Kazuhiro Ishibashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant & cell physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Behind (cell) walls.Nature biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Virus-induced transgene- and tissue culture-free heritable genome editing in tomato.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Host ESCRT machinery orchestrates the assembly of tomato spotted wilt virus ribonucleoproteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genetic transformation and genome editing of flax (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tetsuya YoshidaInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8518, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-1870
Masayuki IshikawaInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8518, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0301-2715
Seiichi TokiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8518, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-6446
Kazuhiro IshibashiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8518, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-3603

Funding

Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution JPJ012287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional plant gene editing requires laborious tissue-culture-mediated transformation, which restricts the range of applicable plant species. In this study, we developed a heritable and tissue-culture-free gene editing method in Nicotiana benthamiana using tobacco ringspot virus (TRSV) as a vector for in planta delivery of Cas9 and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) to shoot apical meristems. Agrobacterium-mediated inoculation of the TRSV vector induced systemic and heritable gene editing in Nicotiana benthamiana PHYTOENE DESATURASE. Transient downregulation of RNA silencing enhanced gene editing efficiency, resulting in an order of magnitude increase (0.8-13.2%) in the frequency of transgenerational gene editing. While the TRSV system had a preference for certain sgRNA sequences, co-inoculation of a TRSV vector carrying only Cas9 and a tobacco rattle virus vector carrying sgRNA successfully introduced systemic mutations with all five tested sgRNAs. Extensively gene-edited lateral shoots occasionally grew from plants inoculated with the virus vectors, the transgenerational gene editing frequency of which ranged up to 100%. This virus-mediated heritable gene editing method makes plant gene editing easy, requiring only the inoculation of non-transgenic plants with a virus vector(s) to obtain gene-edited individuals.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenetic VectorsNicotianaPlant VirusesAgrobacteriumCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsOxidoreductasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTombusviridaeCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Oxidoreductasesphytoene dehydrogenaseRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene editingNepovirusPlant virusVirus vector

Identifiers

PMID39215594
PMCPMC11631083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.