Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215539›Full record

ArticleAllergy2025

Basophil activation test is a complementary tool in the diagnosis of immediate reactions to platinum salts and taxanes.

Gádor Bogas, Adriana Ariza, Paula Vázquez-Revuelta, Marina Labella, Ricardo Madrigal-Burgaleta, Rubén Fernández-Santamaría, Silvia Calvo-Serrano, Esther Villar-Chamorro, Susana Martín-Clavo, Clara Lebrón-Martín and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. AllergoOncology in Review: Harnessing Allergy in the Field of Oncology to Improve Patient Outcomes.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gádor BogasAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1868-3471
Adriana ArizaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-9602
Paula Vázquez-RevueltaDrug Desensitization Centre, Catalan Institute of Oncology (Institut Català d'oncologia-ICO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-9180
Marina LabellaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-4067
Ricardo Madrigal-BurgaletaAllergy and Severe Asthma Service, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-3578
Rubén Fernández-SantamaríaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-4280
Silvia Calvo-SerranoAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-6696
Esther Villar-ChamorroUGCI Oncología Médica, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga y Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Susana Martín-ClavoServicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Materno Infantil, Málaga, Spain.
Clara Lebrón-MartínAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1694-7269
Cristobalina MayorgaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8852-8077
Inmaculada DoñaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-4878
Maria J TorresAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-471X

Funding

Andalusian Regional Goverment PREDOC_01545Andalusian Regional Ministry Health B-0007-2022Andalusian Regional Ministry Health C1-0007-2023Andalusian Regional Ministry Health PI-0076-2019Andalusian Regional Ministry Health RC-0004-2021Andalusian Regional Ministry Health RH-0099-2020Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) PI18/00095|FI23/00027|PI22/01119Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) RICORSREI(RD21/0002/0008)Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and co-funded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional-FEDER RETICSARADYALRD16/0006/0001Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelabelling pathways offer confirmatory diagnosis and can prevent unnecessary second-line therapies or drug desensitization procedures after chemotherapeutic hypersensitivity reactions (CHT-HSRs). However, these pathways rely on risky in vivo tests. Data on whether in vitro tests could be helpful are scarce. We assessed the role of basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of HSRs to platin salts (PSs) and taxanes (TXs) in a well-defined population featuring varied endophenotypes and severities of HSRs.

methodsWe conducted a 3-year-long multicentric, prospective study with 121 suspected-immediate CHT-HSR patients. The allergy workup included clinical history (initial reaction based on Type I, cytokine release syndrome, and mixed phenotype's symptoms and if unable to fit in any of these, as "indeterminate"), skin testing (ST), and drug provocation testing (DPT), provided risk assessment was favorable. Final diagnosis classified patients as "hypersensitive," "non-hypersensitive," or "inconclusive." We performed BAT using CD63 and CD203c as activation markers in patients and controls. Patients underwent DPT regardless of BAT results to prevent bias.

resultsST positivity significantly correlated with skin involvement, Type I phenotype, cancer recurrence, and lifetime exposures before reactions. DPTs were negative in all indeterminate phenotype patients (p = .02) and those considered low-risk, whereas they were negative in 62% moderate-risk patients. 55% were confirmed as hypersensitive (mainly Type I reactions, p < .0001), 24% as non-hypersensitive (mainly TXs and indeterminate phenotypes), and 21% as inconclusive. BAT showed 79% sensitivity in Type I IgE-mediated reactions to PSs with a high correlation to ST.

conclusionsBAT is a promising tool for delabelling and endotyping CHT-HSRs, especially Type I reactions to PSs, possibly identifying patients at risk of positive DPT. ST seems useful in confirming CHT-HSRs, especially PS-induced reactions, and DPT remains the gold standard, being essential even in moderate-risk patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBasophil Degranulation TestBasophilsDrug HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediatePlatinum CompoundsTaxoidsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSkin TestsAntineoplastic AgentsPlatinum CompoundsTaxoidsbasophil activation testchemotherapydrug provocation testsendophenotypeskin tests

Identifiers

PMID39215539
PMCPMC11724245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.