Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215399›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

Immunotherapeutic advances in glioma management: The rise of vaccine-based approaches.

Wireko Andrew Awuah, Muhammad Hamza Shah, Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Sruthi Ranganathan, Vivek Sanker, Kwadwo Darko, Pearl Ohenewaa Tenkorang, Bryan Badayelba Adageba, Arjun Ahluwalia, Vallabh Shet and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Vaccine-based cancer immunotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wireko Andrew AwuahFaculty of Medicine, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.
Muhammad Hamza ShahSchool of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6782-730X
Joecelyn Kirani TanFaculty of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-3648-6553
Sruthi RanganathanDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vivek SankerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Trivandrum Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-8397
Kwadwo DarkoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Pearl Ohenewaa TenkorangUniversity of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
Bryan Badayelba AdagebaKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kumasi, Ghana.
Arjun AhluwaliaSchool of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-6865
Vallabh ShetFaculty of Medicine, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nicholas AderintoDepartment of Internal Medicine, LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
Mrinmoy KunduInstitute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Toufik Abdul-RahmanFaculty of Medicine, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.
Oday AtallahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGliomas, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are highly aggressive brain tumors that present significant challenges in oncology due to their rapid progression and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advancements in treatment, the prognosis for patients with GBM remains poor, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic approaches. One such emerging strategy is the development of glioma vaccines, which aim to stimulate the immune system to target and destroy tumor cells.

aimsThis review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current landscape of glioma vaccine development, analyzing the types of vaccines under investigation, the outcomes of clinical trials, and the challenges and opportunities associated with their implementation. The goal is to highlight the potential of glioma vaccines in advancing more effective and personalized treatments for glioma patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis narrative review systematically assessed the role of glioma vaccines by including full-text articles published between 2000 and 2024 in English. Databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using key terms like "glioma," "brain tumor," "glioblastoma," "vaccine," and "immunotherapy." The review incorporated both pre-clinical and clinical studies, including descriptive studies, animal-model studies, cohort studies, and observational studies. Exclusion criteria were applied to omit abstracts, case reports, posters, and non-peer-reviewed studies, ensuring the inclusion of high-quality evidence.

resultsClinical trials investigating various glioma vaccines, including peptide-based, DNA/RNA-based, whole-cell, and dendritic-cell vaccines, have shown promising results. These vaccines demonstrated potential in extending survival rates and managing adverse events in glioma patients. However, significant challenges remain, such as therapeutic resistance due to tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms. Moreover, the lack of standardized guidelines for evaluating vaccine responses and issues related to ethical considerations, regulatory hurdles, and vaccine acceptance among patients further complicate the implementation of glioma vaccines. DISCUSSION: Addressing the challenges associated with glioma vaccines involves exploring combination therapies, targeted approaches, and personalized medicine. Combining vaccines with traditional therapies like radiotherapy or chemotherapy may enhance efficacy by boosting the immune system's ability to fight tumor cells. Personalized vaccines tailored to individual patient profiles present an opportunity for improved outcomes. Furthermore, global collaboration and equitable distribution are critical for ensuring access to glioma vaccines, especially in low- and middle-income countries with limited healthcare resources

conclusionGlioma vaccines represent a promising avenue in the fight against gliomas, offering hope for improving patient outcomes in a disease that is notoriously difficult to treat. Despite the challenges, continued research and the development of innovative strategies, including combination therapies and personalized approaches, are essential for overcoming current barriers and transforming the treatment landscape for glioma patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesGliomaImmunotherapyAnimalsHumansCancer Vaccinesgliomaglioma vaccinesimmunotherapyneuro‐oncology

Identifiers

PMID39215399
PMCPMC11364516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.