Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215305›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2024

Sex determination through maxillary dental arch and skeletal base measurements using machine learning.

Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Pedro Felipe de Jesus Freitas, Aline Xavier Ferraz, Isabella Christina Costa Quadras, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, Sidnei Priolo Filho, Svenja Beisel-Memmert, Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder, Elisa Souza Camargo, Erika Calvano Küchler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cristiano Miranda de AraujoSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Pedro Felipe de Jesus FreitasSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Aline Xavier FerrazGraduate Program in Human Communication Health, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Isabella Christina Costa QuadrasGraduate Program in Dentistry, Orthodontics, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Bianca Simone ZeigelboimGraduate Program in Human Communication Health, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Sidnei Priolo FilhoGraduate Program in Human Communication Health, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Svenja Beisel-MemmertDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Angela Graciela Deliga SchroderSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Elisa Souza CamargoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Orthodontics, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Erika Calvano KüchlerDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany. Erika.Kuchler@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCranial, facial, nasal, and maxillary widths have been shown to be significantly affected by the individual's sex. The present study aims to use measurements of dental arch and maxillary skeletal base to determine sex, employing supervised machine learning. MATERIALS AND

methodsMaxillary and mandibular tomographic examinations from 100 patients were analyzed to investigate the inter-premolar width, inter-molar width, maxillary width, inter-pterygoid width, nasal cavity width, nostril width, and maxillary length, obtained through Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. The following machine learning algorithms were used to build the predictive models: Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron Classifier (MLP), Decision Tree, and Random Forest Classifier. A 10-fold cross-validation approach was adopted to validate each model. Metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 Score were calculated for each model, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed.

resultsUnivariate analysis showed statistical significance (p < 0.10) for all skeletal and dental variables. Nostril width showed greater importance in two models, while Inter-molar width stood out among dental measurements. The models achieved accuracy values ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 on the test data. Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and SVM models had the highest AUC values, with SVM showing the smallest disparity between cross-validation and test data for accuracy metrics.

conclusionTransverse dental arch and maxillary skeletal base measurements exhibited strong predictive capability, achieving high accuracy with machine learning methods. Among the evaluated models, the SVM algorithm exhibited the best performance. This indicates potential usefulness in forensic sex determination.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental ArchMachine LearningMaxillaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSex Determination AnalysisSex Determination by SkeletonYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMaxillaSex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID39215305
PMCPMC11363530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.