ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024
Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Temporal trends and prognostic factors in critically ill adult patients with acute leukemia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Improving Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Patients With Cancer Hospitalized With Infection: Secondary Analysis of the INSPIRE Cluster Randomized Trials.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- GRP78 dysregulation: A proposed molecular mechanism linking the tumor microenvironment to sepsis susceptibility in patients with cancer (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Clinically recognized sepsis in older adults admitted to medical wards: patient characteristics and hospital outcomes from the REPOSI register.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Septic Shock Associated With Cystostomy: A Fatal Case Due to Delayed Infection Recognition.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic Significance of the Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio to Albumin Ratio in Cancer Patients with Complication of Sepsis: A Retrospectively Cohort Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with mortality in older sepsis patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Germany.Age and ageing · 2026Observational
- Improving mortality prediction in critically ill cancer patients with a multidimensional machine learning model.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Clinical Predictors of Worsening in Non-severe Acute Cholangitis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Convergent immune dysregulation in sepsis and colorectal cancer highlights plasma cells and identifies shared candidate genes.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The association between body temperature parameters and blood culture positivity in the inpatient setting: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of sepsis in immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients: a prospective cohort study in the emergency department.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors and Risk Stratification in Malignant Tumor Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Gender-stratified analysis of sepsis mortality in cancer: a 45-year population-based cohort study.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and outcome of intra-abdominal infections in intensive care unit in Italy from the Italian Register of complicated Intra-abdominal InfectionS-the IRIS study: a prospective observational nationwide study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Acinetobacter baumannii in the Age of Antimicrobial Resistance: Clinical Impact, Therapeutic Approaches, and Vaccine Development.BioMed research international · 2026Review
- Concurrent amebic and cytomegalovirus colitis in immunocompromised patients: two case reports and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sepsis in multimorbidity: a domain-based framework for systemic vulnerability and precision care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosuppressed patients, particularly those with cancer, represent a momentous and increasing portion of the population, especially as cancer incidence rises with population growth and aging. These patients are at a heightened risk of developing severe infections, including sepsis and septic shock, due to multiple immunologic defects such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and T and B-cell impairment. The diverse and complex nature of these immunologic profiles, compounded by the concomitant use of immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, and immunotherapy), superimposed by the breakage of natural protective barriers (e.g., mucosal damage, chronic indwelling catheters, and alterations of anatomical structures), increases the risk of various infections. These and other conditions that mimic sepsis pose substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Factors that elevate the risk of progression to septic shock in these patients include advanced age, pre-existing comorbidities, frailty, type of cancer, the severity of immunosuppression, hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and type and timing of responses to initial treatment. The management of vulnerable cancer patients with sepsis or septic shock varies due to biased clinical practices that may result in delayed access to intensive care and worse outcomes. While septic shock is typically associated with poor outcomes in patients with malignancies, survival has significantly improved over time. Therefore, understanding and addressing the unique needs of cancer patients through a new paradigm, which includes the integration of innovative technologies into our healthcare system (e.g., wireless technologies, medical informatics, precision medicine), targeted management strategies, and robust clinical practices, including early identification and diagnosis, coupled with prompt admission to high-level care facilities that promote a multidisciplinary approach, is crucial for improving their prognosis and overall survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.