Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215274›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.

Farah Y Eid, Ahmed R El-Kalza

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05782088 (Single Versus Repeated Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05782088 nacompletednot on this map

Single Versus Repeated Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNourhan M.AlyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsOrthodontic Tooth Movement, Canine RetractionArmsSingle Piezocision, Repeated Piezocision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Acceleration of canine retraction with conventional versus modified piezocision techniques : A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Farah Y EidDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champolion street, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt. farahyousry66@gmail.com.
Ahmed R El-KalzaDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champolion street, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPiezocision is a minimally invasive surgical method aiming to accelerate tooth movement. However, its effect was found to be transient, appertaining to the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP). Hence, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of single and multiple piezocisions on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Moreover, the impact of both protocols on canine tipping and orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) has been assessed.

methodsThirty indicated patients for the therapeutic extraction of maxillary first premolars were enlisted in this split-mouth study, and they were randomly split into two equal groups, each including 15 subjects. In the Single Application Group (SAG), one side of the maxillary arch arbitrarily received a single piezocision before the onset of canine retraction, whereas in the Multiple Application Group (MAG), piezocisions were randomly performed on one side, three times on a monthly basis, over the 12-week study period. The contralateral sides of both groups served as the controls. Canine retraction was carried out bilaterally using nickel-titanium closed-coil springs, delivering 150 g of force, and the rate of tooth movement, as well as canine tipping were evaluated on a monthly basis, over a 3-month period. Cone-bean computed tomography scans were also conducted pre- and post- canine retraction, and OIIRR was assessed using Malmgren Index.

resultsThe reported outcomes revealed a significant increase in the amount of canine retraction, canine tipping, as well as root resorption scores on the experimental sides in both groups SAG and MAG post-retraction (p < 0.001). However, upon comparing the experimental sides in both groups, non-significant differences have been observed between them regarding all the assessed outcomes (p > 0.05).

conclusionsSingle and multiple piezocisions effectively accelerate OTM in comparison to conventional orthodontic treatment, with relative outcomes reported by both intervention frequencies. Accordingly, single piezocision is recommended as an adjunct to OTM. Furthermore, significant tooth tipping as well as a significantly higher root resorption risk accompanies both single and multiple piezocision applications in conjunction with OTM. NAME OF THE REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05782088 DATE OF REGISTRATION: 23/03/2023 "Retrospectively registered". URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05782088.

Indexed as

CuspidPiezosurgeryRoot ResorptionTooth Movement TechniquesAdolescentAdultBicuspidCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental AlloysFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaNickelOrthodontic WiresTitaniumDental AlloysNickelTitaniumtitanium nickelideAccelerationAnchorage lossCanine retractionPiezocisionRoot resorptionTipping movement

Identifiers

PMID39215274
PMCPMC11365207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.