Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215230›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2024

Identifying exercise and cognitive intervention parameters to optimize executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Wenxin Chen, Jessie Leuk Siew-Pin, Yuhang Wu, Ning Huang, Wei-Peng Teo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenxin ChenPhysical Education College, Hubei University of Arts and Sciences, Hubei, China.
Jessie Leuk Siew-PinPhysical Education and Sport Science (PESS) Department, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Yuhang WuSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ning HuangSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wei-Peng TeoPhysical Education and Sport Science (PESS) Department, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. weipeng.teo@nie.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3929-9778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical exercise is recognized for its beneficial effects on brain health and executive function, particularly through the careful manipulation of key exercise parameters, including type, intensity, and duration. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to delineate the optimal types, intensities, and durations of exercise that improve cognitive functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. A comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed from their inception until December 2023. The methodological quality and publication bias of the included studies were assessed using the PEDro scale and Egger's regression test, respectively. Separate meta-analyses were performed to assess the overall impact of exercise on cognitive assessments and to explore the effects of different exercise types (i.e., aerobic, resistance, dual-task, mind-body, and multi-component exercises) and intensities (i.e., low, moderate, and high) on executive function. Results were presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A meta-regression analysis was conducted to examine the correlation between exercise duration and mean effects. In total, 15,087 articles were retrieved from three databases, of which 35 studies were included in our final analyses. The results indicated high overall methodological quality (PEDro score = 8) but a potential for publication bias (t = 2.08, p = 0.045). Meta-analyses revealed that all types of exercise (SMD = 0.691, CI [0.498 to 0.885], p < 0.001) and intensities (SMD = 0.694, CI [0.485 to 0.903], p < 0.001) show significant effects favoring exercise. Notably, dual-task exercises (SMD = 1.136, CI [0.236 to 2.035], p < 0.001) and moderate-intensity exercises (SMD = 0.876, CI [0.533 to 1.219], p < 0.001) exhibited the greatest effect. No significant correlation was observed between exercise duration and SMD (R² = 0.038, p = 0.313). Overall, our meta-analyses support the role of physical exercise in enhancing executive function in older adults with MCI or dementia. It is essential to carefully tailor exercise parameters, particularly type and intensity, to meet the specific needs of older adults with MCI or dementia. Such customization is crucial for optimizing executive function outcomes and improving overall brain health.

Indexed as

Aerobic exerciseDual-task trainingExecutive functioningMind-body exerciseResistance training

Identifiers

PMID39215230
PMCPMC11363393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.