Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215217›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2024

The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for muscles under active contraction.

Nahian S Chowdhury, Wei-Ju Chang, Rocco Cavaleri, Alan K I Chiang, Siobhan M Schabrun

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nahian S ChowdhuryCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. n.chowdhury@neura.edu.au.
Wei-Ju Chang *Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. WeiJu.Chang@newcastle.edu.au.
Rocco CavaleriBrain Stimulation and Rehabilitation (BrainStAR) Lab, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alan K I ChiangCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Siobhan M SchabrunCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.

Funding

Validation of a novel cortical biomarker signature for painR61NS113269 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DA SILVA, JOYCE TEIXEIRA, SCHABRUN, SIOBHAN · 2019 to 2019
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS113269The National Institutes of Health 1R61NS113269-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid mapping is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping method which can significantly reduce data collection time compared to traditional approaches. However, its validity and reliability has only been established for upper-limb muscles during resting-state activity. Here, we determined the validity and reliability of rapid mapping for non-upper limb muscles that require active contraction during TMS: the masseter and quadriceps muscles. Eleven healthy participants attended two sessions, spaced two hours apart, each involving rapid and 'traditional' mapping of the masseter muscle and three quadriceps muscles (rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis). Map parameters included map volume, map area and centre of gravity (CoG) in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. Low to moderate measurement errors (%SEM

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrain MappingElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMasseter MuscleMuscle, SkeletalQuadriceps MuscleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCorticomotor excitabilityNeuroplasticityReliabilityTMS mappingValidity

Identifiers

PMID39215217
PMCPMC11363547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.