Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215207›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Replicability and generalizability in population psychiatric neuroimaging.

Scott Marek, Timothy O Laumann

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sensorimotor circuit connectivity as a candidate biomarker for responsiveness to sertraline in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Can I trust this paper?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Charting structural brain asymmetry across the human lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Psychiatric neuroimaging designs for individualised, cohort, and population studies.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott MarekMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. smarek@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0032-9052
Timothy O LaumannDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0428-427X

Funding

Precision Functional Mapping in Treatment-Resistant DepressionR00MH129616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY OTTO LAUMANN · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Neurodevelopmental profiles related to transdiagnostic and disorder-specific symptoms of anxiety and depressionR00MH121518 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MAREK, SCOTT · 2022 to 2024
$744k
Neurodevelopmental profiles related to transdiagnostic and disorder-specific symptoms of anxiety and depressionK99MH121518 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MAREK, SCOTT · 2020 to 2021
$228k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH121518NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH121518NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH129616U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH121518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies linking mental health with brain function in cross-sectional population-based association studies have historically relied on small, underpowered samples. Given the small effect sizes typical of such brain-wide associations, studies require samples into the thousands to achieve the statistical power necessary for replicability. Here, we detail how small sample sizes have hampered replicability and provide sample size targets given established association strength benchmarks. Critically, while replicability will improve with larger samples, it is not guaranteed that observed effects will meaningfully apply to target populations of interest (i.e., be generalizable). We discuss important considerations related to generalizability in psychiatric neuroimaging and provide an example of generalizability failure due to "shortcut learning" in brain-based predictions of mental health phenotypes. Shortcut learning is a phenomenon whereby machine learning models learn an association between the brain and an unmeasured construct (the shortcut), rather than the intended target of mental health. Given the complex nature of brain-behavior interactions, the future of epidemiological approaches to brain-based studies of mental health will require large, diverse samples with comprehensive assessment.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNeuroimagingBrainHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID39215207
PMCPMC11526127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.