Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215200›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2025

Machine learning in paediatric haematological malignancies: a systematic review of prognosis, toxicity and treatment response models.

Gerard Gurumurthy, Juditha Gurumurthy, Samantha Gurumurthy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerard GurumurthySchool of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. gerardgurumurthy@doctors.org.uk.
Juditha GurumurthySchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Samantha GurumurthyDepartment of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine Learning (ML) has demonstrated potential in enhancing care in adult oncology. However, its application in paediatric haematological malignancies is still emerging, necessitating a comprehensive review of its capabilities and limitations in this area.

methodsA literature search was conducted through Ovid. Studies included focused on ML models in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies. Studies were categorised into thematic groups for analysis.

resultsTwenty studies, primarily on leukaemia, were included in this review. Studies were organised into thematic categories such as prognoses, treatment responses and toxicity predictions. Prognostic studies showed AUC scores between 0.685 and 0.929, indicating moderate-high predictive accuracy. Treatment response studies demonstrated AUC scores between 0.840 and 0.875, reflecting moderate accuracy. Toxicity prediction studies reported high accuracy with AUC scores from 0.870 to 0.927. Only five studies (25%) performed external validation. Significant heterogeneity was noted in ML tasks, reporting formats, and effect measures across studies, highlighting a lack of standardised reporting and challenges in data comparability.

conclusionThe clinical applicability of these ML models remains limited by the lack of external validation and methodological heterogeneity. Addressing these challenges through standardised reporting and rigorous external validation is needed to translate ML from a promising research tool into a reliable clinical practice component. IMPACT: Key message: Machine Learning (ML) significantly enhances predictive models in paediatric haematological cancers, offering new avenues for personalised treatment strategies. Future research should focus on developing ML models that can integrate with real-time clinical workflows. Addition to literature: Provides a comprehensive overview of current ML applications and trends. It identifies limitations to its applicability, including the limited diversity in datasets, which may affect the generalisability of ML models across different populations. IMPACT: Encourages standardisation and external validation in ML studies, aiming to improve patient outcomes through precision medicine in paediatric haematological oncology.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsMachine LearningChildHumansPediatricsPrognosisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39215200
PMCPMC12014474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.