SynthesisPediatric research2025
Machine learning in paediatric haematological malignancies: a systematic review of prognosis, toxicity and treatment response models.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for pediatric health: Current trends and future opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in acute myeloid leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Pediatric leukemia: origins, pathogenesis, the role of microenvironment and immunological modulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A roadmap of artificial intelligence applications in pediatric surgery: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and ethical considerations.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Review
- Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Methodological and reporting quality of machine learning studies on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine Learning (ML) has demonstrated potential in enhancing care in adult oncology. However, its application in paediatric haematological malignancies is still emerging, necessitating a comprehensive review of its capabilities and limitations in this area.
methodsA literature search was conducted through Ovid. Studies included focused on ML models in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies. Studies were categorised into thematic groups for analysis.
resultsTwenty studies, primarily on leukaemia, were included in this review. Studies were organised into thematic categories such as prognoses, treatment responses and toxicity predictions. Prognostic studies showed AUC scores between 0.685 and 0.929, indicating moderate-high predictive accuracy. Treatment response studies demonstrated AUC scores between 0.840 and 0.875, reflecting moderate accuracy. Toxicity prediction studies reported high accuracy with AUC scores from 0.870 to 0.927. Only five studies (25%) performed external validation. Significant heterogeneity was noted in ML tasks, reporting formats, and effect measures across studies, highlighting a lack of standardised reporting and challenges in data comparability.
conclusionThe clinical applicability of these ML models remains limited by the lack of external validation and methodological heterogeneity. Addressing these challenges through standardised reporting and rigorous external validation is needed to translate ML from a promising research tool into a reliable clinical practice component. IMPACT: Key message: Machine Learning (ML) significantly enhances predictive models in paediatric haematological cancers, offering new avenues for personalised treatment strategies. Future research should focus on developing ML models that can integrate with real-time clinical workflows. Addition to literature: Provides a comprehensive overview of current ML applications and trends. It identifies limitations to its applicability, including the limited diversity in datasets, which may affect the generalisability of ML models across different populations. IMPACT: Encourages standardisation and external validation in ML studies, aiming to improve patient outcomes through precision medicine in paediatric haematological oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.