Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215141›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2024

Dual pathway inhibition with faricimab for previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema: guidance from a UK panel of retina specialists.

Louise Downey, Sobha Sivaprasad, Ramandeep Chhabra, Clare Bailey, Soma Chakrabarti, Samer Elsherbiny, Jignesh Patel, Giuliana Silvestri, Sarah-Lucie Watson, Gwyn Williams and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Louise DowneyHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK. Louise.downey1@nhs.net.
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-0659
Ramandeep ChhabraManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Clare BaileyUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2141-4512
Soma ChakrabartiNHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Samer ElsherbinySouth Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, UK.
Jignesh PatelColchester District General Hospital, Colchester, UK.
Giuliana SilvestriBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-5374
Sarah-Lucie WatsonRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
Gwyn WilliamsSwansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Antony ParkerRoche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Saima KhokharRoche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Andrew LoterySouthampton Eye Unit and Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-4305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSome eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO) fail to respond sufficiently or lose response over time to standard of care intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. This paper explores clinical scenarios for switching to dual action angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2)/VEGF-A inhibitor faricimab (Vabysmo, Roche Products Limited) in previously anti-VEGF-treated patients.

methodsA national steering group meeting of UK retina specialists was held in London on 27 October 2023. Clinician practice and experience were reviewed together with pivotal clinical trial data and early findings from real-world settings. Roche Products Limited facilitated and funded the meeting.

resultsWhile there is no standardised protocol for identifying suboptimal response, the authors review relevant clinical biomarkers of disease activity used in routine clinical practice to determine patient response and guide treatment decisions. Common reasons identified for considering a change of treatment were lack of efficacy demonstrated by suboptimal anatomic or visual improvement and insufficient durability of response. The panel outline strategies for switching to faricimab among eligible patients with a prior anti-VEGF treatment history, with initial monthly loading doses or maintaining the previous treatment interval before attempting to extend, that may be integrated into current treat-and-extend (T&E) clinical pathways for treating patients with nAMD and DMO. General considerations for switching between treatments are also reviewed.

conclusionClinicians may consider a treatment switch to faricimab in nAMD and DMO patients who have suboptimal disease control or insufficient durability of response on initial anti-VEGF therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsDiabetic RetinopathyIntravitreal InjectionsMacular EdemaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AWet Macular DegenerationAngiopoietin-2HumansUnited KingdomVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiopoietin-2Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID39215141
PMCPMC11544140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.