Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39215125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of lumbar spine pathology on asymmetrical hallux valgus in a population-based cohort study.

Takumi Matsumoto, Ryutaro Takeda, Toshiko Iidaka, Chiaki Horii, Hiroyuki Oka, Shigeyuki Muraki, Suguru Inokuchi, Satoshi Arita, Yuyu Ishimoto, Hiroshi Hashizume and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takumi MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. matumot-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Ryutaro TakedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Toshiko IidakaDepartment of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiaki HoriiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkaDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeyuki MurakiDepartment of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Suguru InokuchiInokuchi Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi AritaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuyu IshimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi HashizumeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi YamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Munehito YoshidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kozo NakamuraTowa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Noriko YoshimuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 17dk0110028h0001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 17gk0210007h0003Japan Dairy Association 2017Japan Osteoporosis Foundation 2019Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H03895Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19K19454Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 19FA0701Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 19FA1401Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation 2016Nakatomi Foundation 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of lumbar spine disorders on the development of asymmetric hallux valgus (HV). Data from the fifth survey of the Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) study, a nationwide prospective study in Japan, were analyzed. HV severity was categorized into 4 grades based on the radiographic HV angle, and asymmetric HV was defined as having at least one HV on either side, with a difference of two or more severity grades between the left and right. Controls were matched from both the Normal group (without HV on both sides) and the Symmetric group (HV on at least one side with a difference of one or less severity grades). Univariate analysis assessed lumbar conditions, and multinomial logistic regression analysis explored the association between lumbar spine disorders and asymmetric HV. Among 1997 participants, 27 had asymmetric HV. Univariate analysis revealed a higher incidence of L5 spondylolisthesis and scoliosis in the Asymmetric group. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that scoliosis independently increased the likelihood of asymmetrical HV (Odds ratio [OR] = 3.586, 95%Confidence interval [CI] 1.111-11.582), but showed no significant impact on symmetrical HV (OR 0.910, 95% CI 0.355-2.334). Asymmetric HV is rare but may be associated with lumbar spine disorders, particularly scoliosis.

Indexed as

Hallux ValgusLumbar VertebraeAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesScoliosisSpondylolisthesis

Identifiers

PMID39215125
PMCPMC11364685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.