ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep-learning-based method for the segmentation of ureter and renal pelvis on non-enhanced CT scans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating Training Data for Ureter Segmentation Using Dual-Energy CT Two-Material Decomposition.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.Cureus · 2025Review
- Segmentation of renal vessels on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Bibliometrics of artificial intelligence applications in hepatobiliary surgery from 2014 to 2024.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a deep-learning (DL) based method for three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of the upper urinary tract (UUT), including ureter and renal pelvis, on non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) scans. A total of 150 NECT scans with normal appearance of the left UUT were chosen for this study. The dataset was divided into training (n = 130) and validation sets (n = 20). The test set contained 29 randomly chosen cases with computed tomography urography (CTU) and NECT scans, all with normal appearance of the left UUT. An experienced radiologist marked out the left renal pelvis and ureter on each scan. Two types of frameworks (entire and sectional) with three types of DL models (basic UNet, UNet3 + and ViT-UNet) were developed, and evaluated. The sectional framework with basic UNet model achieved the highest mean precision (85.5%) and mean recall (71.9%) on the test set compared to all other tested methods. Compared with CTU scans, this method had higher axial UUT recall than CTU (82.5% vs 69.1%, P < 0.01). This method achieved similar or better visualization of UUT than CTU in many cases, however, in some cases, it exhibited a non-ignorable false-positive rate. The proposed DL method demonstrates promising potential in automated 3D UUT segmentation on NECT scans. The proposed DL models could remarkably improve the efficiency of UUT reconstruction, and have the potential to save many patients from invasive examinations such as CTU. DL models could also serve as a valuable complement to CTU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.